Re: [NetEpic ML] New poll for netepic

From: cibernyam <cibernyam_at_...>
Date: Wed, 22 Sep 2004 16:45:18 +0200

> Re: tunnelers vs troops:
> > the rule should specify "infantry"
>
> I agree. How about "base-to-base contact with a model it can pin." I don't
think changing pinning class is a good idea, but I'm open for discussion.

The point is to give a small advantage to tunnelers over other vehicles when
running over other things, since the tunneler front is specifically designed
to open a way through anything insteadof just colliding.



> >- It could be worth adding a small example of a CC fight of a Titan
against
> multiple opponents, probably better if at least one Titan/praetorian, one
> knight/SH and some vehicles and infantry (elite and not elite are added)
> were present.
>
> You're right, and I'll take a gander at it. My only objection stems from
my not wanting to add a page containing only an example. If this isn't a
concern to anyone else I'll do it, but I preferred to have a smaller
rulebook.

I agree, although Titans are a very specific and highlighted kind of unit in
NetEpic, which usually come across many exceptions of the rules. If it takes
too much space, an extra apendix with a short example of a game turn (or a
section of examples in a possible FAQ booklet) could be added... It could be
also just made available as an add-on in the download page like "sample turn
of a Netepic typical battle" with two forces of around 100 points in usual
problematic situations.

Albert
Received on Wed Sep 22 2004 - 14:45:18 UTC