[NetEpic ML] Re: Ginchy New potential Tank: What Faction...?

From: Toma Diener <peyoterattle_at_...>
Date: Sun, 05 Mar 2006 13:20:43 -0000

Blargh! Broken Links, All!!

I don't know if TinyUrl works with MACs, but :

http://tinyurl.com/k42tp

http://tinyurl.com/zfcgj

http://tinyurl.com/j2efu



--- In netepic_at_yahoogroups.com, "Toma Diener"
<peyoterattle_at_...> wrote:
>
> OK: I can see 'em as Necron Spidey-Dredds...
>
> What Necron stat-line would you suggest for these...? :
>
>
http://www.privateerpress.com/WARMACHINE/gallery/miniature_
> pages/previews/stalker_preview.html
>
>
http://www.privateerpress.com/WARMACHINE/gallery/miniature_
> pages/previews/cryx_leviathan_preview.html
>
>
http://privateerpress.com/WARMACHINE/gallery/miniature_page
> s/previews/harrower_preview.html
>
>
> I'm intriqued by a non- B-Tech Necron Proxie list.
>
>
> Whilst I'm musing on the subject: Have WarMachine mini's
been
> looked at for proxy-purposes yet? Quite a few of the 'Jacks
have
> a Classic ''Adeptus Titanicus'' feel to them (moreso IMO than
the
> majority of recent GW offerings), and the growing number of
> Privateer Players suggest a potential pool of NetEpic converts.
>
> Has this been talked about already...?
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> --- In netepic_at_yahoogroups.com, Peter Ramos <primarch@>
> wrote:
> > >At 12:30 AM 22/02/2006, you wrote:
> > >>or, even better: lemme see if the original TMP link will
work->
> > >>http://theminiaturespage.com/news/739835/
> > The current proxy for the Necron spider dreadnought is quite
> bulky and
> > unwieldy (besides being too large). I think this is a much
better
> proxy.
> >
> > Opinions?
> >
> > Peter
> >
>
Received on Sun Mar 05 2006 - 13:20:43 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Tue Oct 22 2019 - 11:00:04 UTC