Re: [NetEpic ML] Re: Squat Thunderfire Battery

From: Ed Raith <ewraith_at_...>
Date: Tue, 18 Apr 2006 12:19:28 -0400

I agree ThunderFires should be a standard unit.
Ed

----- Original Message -----
From: "Tim Johns" <tmjohns9_at_...>
To: <netepic_at_yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Tuesday, April 18, 2006 9:07 AM
Subject: [NetEpic ML] Re: Squat Thunderfire Battery


> The Thunderfires were sold in blisters of two.
>
> As for "official" status, it seesm to me that they should be standard
> units since they appear in the TL codex. I can seem them being
> optional units if they were only released in WD, but that's not the
> case.
>
>
> --- In netepic_at_yahoogroups.com, "Stephane" <kotrin@...> wrote:
>>
>> Hi folks,
>>
>> Currently building my Squat army, I've seen that the Thunderfire
>> battery is "*" in the army list [opponent's consent],
>> despite "official" miniatures existing for them. Moreover, it seems
>> that the unit contains two batteries - yet, if my memory serves (and
>> accordingly to some Ebay auctions) the thunderfire batteries were
> sold
>> in set of three.
>>
>> Any reason for those discrepancies? Shouldn't the unit be corrected
>> accordingly to guidelines above? I leave this question to popular
>> wisdom...
>>
>> Stephane
>>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> To unsubscribe send e-mail to: netepic-unsubscribe_at_egroups.com
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>
>
>
Received on Tue Apr 18 2006 - 16:19:28 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Tue Oct 22 2019 - 11:00:04 UTC