[NetEpic ML] Re: Revision Issue: Titans

From: Tzeentch <tzeentch666_at_...>
Date: Thu, 17 Feb 2000 23:27:15 -0800

One option (hang with me here) is to move the reactor to the rear of the
Warlord. Keep the saving throw as-is but it can only be hit from behind.
That should reward players who like to manuever.

I personally like my staging regeneration but if it comes down to "one
number, no variables" I'd throw in with 4+ repair for VSGs, maybe bump the
Eldar repair rolls a bit and keep the orks the same.

There's a war out there, old friend, a world war. And it's not about who's
got the most bullets, it's about who controls the information. What we see
and hear, how we work, what we think, it's all about the information!
     Cosmo, 'Sneakers'

----- Original Message -----
From: <jyrki.saari_at_...>
To: <netepic_at_egroups.com>
Sent: Thursday, February 17, 2000 11:15 PM
Subject: [NetEpic ML] Re: Revision Issue: Titans

> [snip]
> 1. Void shield repair is on a 3+ as well as repair
> JS: I think this is too much. 4+ is sufficient for both.
> 2. The reactor on the warlord should be a 1+
> Definetely. The warlord hull is the crappiest in existence yet it's still
> the most expensive.
> Jyrki Saari
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> *** Got Questions? Get Answers. Got Answers? Get Paid. ***
> Sign up at Infomarco.com and you can win $30,000 cash or a trip to China.
> http://click.egroups.com/1/1251/2/_/7255/_/950858148/
> -- Easily schedule meetings and events using the group calendar!
> -- http://www.egroups.com/cal?listname=netepic&m=1
Received on Fri Feb 18 2000 - 07:27:15 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Tue Oct 22 2019 - 10:58:51 UTC