Tzeentch,
Yes, I agree, Eldar should be Super-Duper.
Maybe keep thier templates the way they are, but increase the repair
roll to 3+.
What do you think about that?
Warprat ;)
Tzeentch wrote:
>
> In Adeptus Titanicus/Codex Titanicus Eldar got a +1 on their repair rolls -
> which is why I suggest they always stay "state of the art" compared to
> however we modify the Imperial stuff. To quote CT p. 56
>
> "Co-ordinated by the shared consciousness of crew and Infinity Circuit,
> Eldar repair systems are highly effective in locating and repairing damage."
>
> I should point out that originally the holo-field affected even barrage
> templates.
>
> They also got a +1 when attacking non-Eldar titans with close combat
> weapons. This was a "to-hit roll" (Titans in AT did not use CAF). Perhaps a
> bonus to grab attacks with powerfist and the like?
>
> It also noted a Phantom engaged in close combat had the holo-modifier
> reduced to -1 for the DURATION OF THE CLOSE COMBAT. I put that in uppercase
> because it obviously implied it went back up to the original value after
> close combat was over.
>
> Another interesting point was that Phantoms were so fast that opposing
> non-Eldar Titans had to reveal their orders before the Phantoms chose
> theirs.
>
> Well enough reminiscing. I suggest everyone with an interest check out the
> (now COMPLETE) set of 1st Edition Space Marine rules. I updated the unit
> reference templates but I started work on OCRing Fifth Frontier War so the
> Titan datacharts won't go up until I get done with the first round of OCR.
> You can get the information on the variants from AT in the text anyways.
>
> Ken
> ---------------------------
> There's a war out there, old friend, a world war. And it's not about who's
> got the most bullets, it's about who controls the information. What we see
> and hear, how we work, what we think, it's all about the information!
> Cosmo, 'Sneakers'
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Warprat <warprat_at_...>
> To: <netepic_at_egroups.com>
> Sent: Thursday, February 17, 2000 11:48 PM
> Subject: [NetEpic ML] Re: Revision Issue: Titans
>
> > Tzeentch,
> >
> > YES! Wonderfull idea!
> >
> > 1) Move the reactor on the Warlord. How about moving all forward facing
> > reactors, on all titans, to the rear.
> >
> > 2) Give a 4+ repair roll to all titans. Of course, Orks would remain
> > the same.
> >
> > 3) Perhaps the Eldar do deserve to have a 3+ repair roll, even if the
> > reactor location is changed. I don't have enough experience with the
> > Eldar to have a good gut feeling on that. I bow to your greater wisdom.
> >
> >
> > Hail to the Old Guard!
> >
> > Warprat ;)
> >
> >
> > Tzeentch wrote:
> > >
> > > One option (hang with me here) is to move the reactor to the rear of the
> > > Warlord. Keep the saving throw as-is but it can only be hit from behind.
> > > That should reward players who like to manuever.
> > >
> > > I personally like my staging regeneration but if it comes down to "one
> > > number, no variables" I'd throw in with 4+ repair for VSGs, maybe bump
> the
> > > Eldar repair rolls a bit and keep the orks the same.
> > >
> > > Ken
> > > ---------------------------
> > > There's a war out there, old friend, a world war. And it's not about
> who's
> > > got the most bullets, it's about who controls the information. What we
> see
> > > and hear, how we work, what we think, it's all about the information!
> > > Cosmo, 'Sneakers'
> > >
> > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > From: <jyrki.saari_at_...>
> > > To: <netepic_at_egroups.com>
> > > Sent: Thursday, February 17, 2000 11:15 PM
> > > Subject: [NetEpic ML] Re: Revision Issue: Titans
> > >
> > > > [snip]
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > 1. Void shield repair is on a 3+ as well as repair
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > JS: I think this is too much. 4+ is sufficient for both.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > 2. The reactor on the warlord should be a 1+
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Definetely. The warlord hull is the crappiest in existence yet it's
> still
> > > > the most expensive.
> > > >
> > > > Jyrki Saari
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > *** Got Questions? Get Answers. Got Answers? Get Paid. ***
> > > > Sign up at Infomarco.com and you can win $30,000 cash or a trip to
> China.
> > > > http://click.egroups.com/1/1251/2/_/7255/_/950858148/
> > > >
> > > > -- Easily schedule meetings and events using the group calendar!
> > > > -- http://www.egroups.com/cal?listname=netepic&m=1
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > *** Got Questions? Get Answers. Got Answers? Get Paid. ***
> > > Sign up at Infomarco.com and you can win $30,000 cash or a trip to
> China.
> > > http://click.egroups.com/1/1251/2/_/7255/_/950858598/
> > >
> > > -- 20 megs of disk space in your group's Document Vault
> > > -- http://www.egroups.com/docvault/netepic/?m=1
> >
> > ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > -- Create a poll/survey for your group!
> > -- http://www.egroups.com/vote?listname=netepic&m=1
> >
> >
> >
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Learn more with SmartPlanet. It's a new way of learning online.
> SmartPlanet offers hundreds of courses to take on your time,
> in your space. Join for FREE today!
> http://click.egroups.com/1/1704/2/_/7255/_/950861458/
>
> eGroups.com Home: http://www.egroups.com/group/netepic/
> http://www.egroups.com - Simplifying group communications
Received on Fri Feb 18 2000 - 08:16:25 UTC