I agree with everything Weasel has said here. Add these to my list,
please.
The Warlord cost is a bit troubleing. One more point to consider. The
Warlord has more head weapon options, than other titans, so this should
also be reflected in the price. Of course, the increased vulnerability,
and cost of head weapons, may make this a mute point.
Warlord cost 475 pts?
Also, has no one else noticed that the Warhound cost is actually 125pts.
right now?
Warprat ;)
Weasel Fierce wrote:
>
> >I will list the various hulls and current price, I would like opinions on
> >if the cost should increase or decrease and by how much.
> >
> >Warhound hull, 250 points
> >Reaver hull, 300
> >Warlord hull, 500
>
> I think the warlord is overpriced....what does it get? 2 more shields, a
> slightly higher CAF and the ability to mount another gun...which cost moe
> points! �nd its a lot slower
>
> i dont know...perhaps 450 or something?
>
> > Quake Cannon
> > 85
>
> Rather shitty when compared to turbo lasers. Reduce cost
>
> >
> > Turbo-Laser Destructor
> > 75
>
> Wild when comapred to gatlings and laser blasters.
>
> > Multiple Rocket Launcher
> > 50
>
> Certainly the worst titan weapon available. I think these should have a -1
> save modifier
>
> > Cerberus AA Gun*
> > 40
>
> Make this one better than a hydra flak tank and it MIGHT be worth more than
> 10 points....if it remains as piss poor as it is now, just ditch it
>
> weasel
> ______________________________________________________
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Get paid for the computing stuff you know!
> Get answers for the stuff you don�t. And get $10 to spend on the site!
> http://click.egroups.com/1/2197/2/_/7255/_/952274762/
>
> -- Create a poll/survey for your group!
> -- http://www.egroups.com/vote?listname=netepic&m=1
Received on Sun Mar 05 2000 - 18:17:20 UTC