well maybe 3D6 but 4 is being unreal
----- Original Message -----
From: "Peter Ramos" <pramos2_at_...>
To: <netepic_at_egroups.com>
Sent: Thursday, March 16, 2000 4:23 PM
Subject: [NetEpic ML] Re: Eldar Holofields
> Hi!
>
> I agree its not a bad idea at all. I'd add the additonal ruling that you
> can't indirect barrage it, or if you could scatter 4d6cm.
>
> Not bad at all.
>
> Peter
>
>
> > >When I was reading, one idea come up for Holofields ... what about
> > >remain with the old rules but _any_ barrage shot against
Holo-protected
> > >thing (even direct) _must_ scatter as indirect, after all if you relly
> > >don't know where something is you cannot directly fire against it, this
> > >sound more simple and fit more with the idea of Holofield.
> > >
> > >Opinions?
> > >
> >
> >
> > Not a bad idea at all.
> >
> > b
> >
> >
> >
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------
> ------
> >
> >
> > eGroups.com Home: http://www.egroups.com/group/netepic
> > www.egroups.com - Simplifying group communications
> >
> >
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Special Offer-Earn 300 Points from MyPoints.com for trying _at_Backup
> Get automatic protection and access to your important computer files.
> Install today:
> http://click.egroups.com/1/2344/2/_/7255/_/953242135/
>
> -- Easily schedule meetings and events using the group calendar!
> -- http://www.egroups.com/cal?listname=netepic&m=1
>
>
>
__________________________________________
NetZero - Defenders of the Free World
Get your FREE Internet Access and Email at
http://www.netzero.net/download/index.html
Received on Fri Mar 17 2000 - 00:47:41 UTC