[NetEpic ML] Re: More stuff to argue..er.. I mean discuss abo ut

From: eivind borgeteien <eivind.borgeteien_at_...>
Date: Wed, 29 Mar 2000 12:16:06 +0200

-1 caf to cavalry in woods would be sufficient. As far as I know, netepic is
the only strategy game that doesn't give any penalty to cavalry in woods...

Eivind

-----Original Message-----
From: Warprat [mailto:warprat_at_...]
Sent: 29. mars 2000 06:26
To: netepic_at_egroups.com
Subject: [NetEpic ML] Re: More stuff to argue..er.. I mean discuss about


Peter Ramos wrote:

> > Watch the movie "Glory", you'll see a failed cavalry charge, through the
> > woods. The infantry blasted them at "point blank" with first fire.
> > Have you ever played Napolionics, or American Civil War? Cavalry
> > charges through woods are common. My history playing pal, almost had a
> > seizure, when I pointed out the same thing you did.
>
> I watched it a few times, you may be right. However I'd give them a
penalty
> versus infantry since they are far better in weoods than infnatry.


Yes, woods tend to disrupt tightly packed formations. Of troops and
cavalry. I could see a -1 penalty, for cavalry.

What say you?


Warprat ;)

------------------------------------------------------------------------
You have a voice mail message waiting for you at iHello.com:
http://click.egroups.com/1/2377/3/_/7255/_/954304265/

-- Talk to your group with your own voice!
-- http://www.egroups.com/VoiceChatPage?listName=netepic&m=1
Received on Wed Mar 29 2000 - 10:16:06 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Tue Oct 22 2019 - 10:58:55 UTC