Hi!
Cool! I'll be waiting to see what you cooked up.
Peter
> Thanks Peter!
>
> I'm posting this message from work, we use a Microsoft NT server, and
> it's not always the best. Sometimes, after writing a post and
> hitting send, the system loses everything I just wrote. So I don't
> post from work too much.
>
> At home, I'm finishing my taxes. So, you know what I'll be doing
> this weekend! Expect some posts from me on Monday or Tuesday.
>
>
> Thanks again!
>
> Warprat ;)
>
>
>
>
>
> --- In netepic_at_egroups.com, "Peter Ramos" <pramos2_at_u...> wrote:
> > Hi!
> >
> > Hmmm.. I thought most of the discussion was winding down since no
> new ideas
> > were being proposed.
> >
> > Note that voting on a idea or alternative doesn't mean that that
> alternative
> > can not be modified or changed.
> >
> > If you or anyone has more to add or change on existing idea please
> do so, It
> > is easy to modify the poll and re-vote.
> >
> > I promise that I will NOT finalize this particular poll until
> everyone gets
> > their ideas out. The current poll will give a good idea where favor
> lies
> > even though we may very well change it.
> >
> > So PLEASE, state whatever opinin, change idea, alternate you got no
> matter
> > how small or strange it may seem since these are the last polls
> before i sit
> > down and re-edit all this.
> >
> > Thanks for pointing it out, I do admit I am quite impatient to begin
> > re-editing, but I will not close this poll until everyone is
> satisfied.
> >
> > Peter
> >
> > > Hi Peter!
> > >
> > > I think it's a bit premature for a vote. Discussion has evolved
> > > beyond my original idea. I'm glad I got the ball roll rolling,
> but I
> > > wouldn't vote for my Warprat's rules, at this point.
> > >
> > > We need more discussion!
> > >
> > >
> > > What does everyone else think?
> > >
> > > Warprat ;)
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --- In netepic_at_egroups.com, netepic_at_egroups.com wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Enter your vote today! Check out the new poll for the netepic
> > > > group:
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Members will decide on titan close
> > > > combat rules. Alterantives 2 and 3
> > > > outweigh alternative number one for
> > > > majority vote.
> > > >
> > > > o Keep the current titan defense rules (electrohull)
> > > > o Rule where the whole assaulting force is considered one
> attack
> > > (Warprat rules, read post for the details)
> > > > o Increase titan CAF's and use standard close combat rules for
> > > all titans
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > To vote, please visit the following web page:
> > > >
> > > > http://www.egroups.com/polls/netepic
> > > >
> > > > Note: Please do not reply to this message. Poll votes are
> > > > not collected via email. To vote, you must go to the eGroups
> > > > web site listed above.
> > > >
> > > > Thanks!
> > >
> > >
> > >
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> --
> > > Win $1000 this Friday!
> > > Go to:
> > > http://click.egroups.com/1/2892/3/_/7255/_/955818864/
> > >
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> --
> > >
> > >
> > >
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Make money at pointclick!
> Hundreds of retailers with tons of discounts!
> http://click.egroups.com/1/3418/3/_/7255/_/955829027/
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
>
Received on Sat Apr 15 2000 - 20:31:46 UTC