RE: [NetEpic ML] RE: [Net Epic ML] More questions about Slann 4.0

From: Karlsen Rune <rune.karlsen_at_...>
Date: Tue, 23 May 2000 15:11:39 +0200

        Yep, that's my gripe :-)
        Why shouldn't the most powerful Mechs get a chance
        to have a Vanguard without having to field another
        mech CC? Are there no commanders who want to do
        it? ;)

        Rune

                -----Original Message-----
                From: Peter Ramos [mailto:pramos2_at_...]
                Sent: 2000-05-23 15:07
                To: netepic_at_egroups.com
                Subject: [NetEpic ML] RE: [Net Epic ML] More
questions about Slann 4.0

                Hi!

                They are no support cards, so they don't get a Vanguard Mech
anymore. They
                would have to draw on another company's vanguard.

                Peter

                -----Original Message-----
                From: Karlsen Rune [mailto:rune.karlsen_at_...]
                Sent: Tuesday, May 23, 2000 7:36 AM
                To: 'netepic_at_egroups.com'
                Subject: [NetEpic ML] More questions about Slann 4.0


                Shouldn't the Bullfrogs have a chance to have a Vanguard
                Mech with them without taking another Mech Company Card?

                Rune

        
------------------------------------------------------------------------
                "Use it or lose it" - Your $5 expires in 7 days
                CDs, movies, books, or video games already half price
                _at_ Half.com - click here
                http://click.egroups.com/1/4508/5/_/7255/_/959085396/
        
------------------------------------------------------------------------




        
------------------------------------------------------------------------
                eGroups
                free, easy email groups
                Start a new email group today at
                http://click.egroups.com/1/3949/5/_/7255/_/959087319/
        
------------------------------------------------------------------------
                
Received on Tue May 23 2000 - 13:11:39 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Tue Oct 22 2019 - 10:59:00 UTC