I also thought we agreed that the squat goliath megacannon should be able to
destroy buildings in one shot... or......? :-)
Eivind
-----Original Message-----
From: "Stef�n Flego, Kerfistj�ri TMD" [mailto:flego_at_...]
Sent: Wednesday, August 23, 2000 3:22 PM
To: 'netepic_at_egroups.com'
Subject: RE: [NetEpic ML] 4.0 Titans
How about the Squats? those two new hearthfury and hearthlord, cc values for
wariors and the thunderes ?
Stefan
-----Original Message-----
From: peter ramos [mailto:ramospeter_at_...]
Sent: 23. �g�st 2000 13:25
To: netepic_at_egroups.com
Subject: Re: [NetEpic ML] 4.0 Titans
Hi!
Darn it! I always forget way to many things, I will change that.
Then again thats where all of you come in with all this editing help a lot
of typos will be eliminated, not to mention bad wording.
peter
>From: "dardman" <dardman_at_...>
>Reply-To: netepic_at_egroups.com
>To: <netepic_at_egroups.com>
>Subject: [NetEpic ML] 4.0 Titans
>Date: Wed, 23 Aug 2000 07:45:41 -0400
>
>I thought we had agreed upon making the Warlord titans reactor a +1 because
>it was a serious achilles heel. There was no change in the hit location
>table for the warlord. Thanks,
>Darius
________________________________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at
http://www.hotmail.com
To unsubscribe send e-mail to: netepic-unsubscribe_at_egroups.com
To unsubscribe send e-mail to: netepic-unsubscribe_at_egroups.com
###########################################
This message has been scanned by F-Secure Anti-Virus for Microsoft Exchange.
For more information, connect to
http://www.F-Secure.com/
Received on Thu Aug 24 2000 - 09:45:32 UTC