Hi!
The correction now states that you can take two straight activations meaning
you can move a unit with an order then try to move another unit without an
order thats close to a warlock, these are two separate activations, also I
included the statement that the eldar player may not use the warlock power
to place an order that would permit a unit to act in a segment of the turn
that has gone by or "passed".
----- Original Message -----
From: "Andy Michaud" <amichaud_at_...>
To: <netepic_at_egroups.com>
Sent: Thursday, August 24, 2000 4:43 PM
Subject: Re: [NetEpic ML] Re: 4.0 questions?
>
>
> Peter Ramos wrote:
> >
> > Hi!
> >
> > The term means once the eldar player declares he has no more units to
move
> > or activate in a given segment (thus passing his turn), he may NOT then
> > later use the warlocks power to place an order that would permit him to
act
> > in a phase that has concluded.
> >
> > For example if the first fire phase is concluded the eldar player cant
later
> > say he will place an order on a unit within 10cm of the warlock to
permit
> > him to first fire since that phase has concluded.
> >
> > I'll re-arange the wording to make it clearer.
> >
> > Peter
>
> The bottom description is much clearer as to what the rule is trying to
> do. Thanks for the explanation.
>
> Andy
>
>
> To unsubscribe send e-mail to: netepic-unsubscribe_at_egroups.com
>
Received on Thu Aug 24 2000 - 22:26:27 UTC