[snip]
> >Scorpions
> >The mandiblaster is already factored into their CAF I say -
> the less rolls
> >made in the game the better. If NE4 has separate
> mandiblaster attacks I
> >vote
> >for removing them.
>
> Thats the problem though since they are factored into the CAF
> how do you
> handle units with saves? Should fixed units be immune (as already
> suggested), or what? Actually this extra roll is not too bad
> you already do
> it for the many chaos cards that permit a similar attack
> before close combat
> this would be no different, otherwise you need a long
> description of who and
> who not does the scorpion get 3d6 against.
>
Not really; just say that scorpions don't get the extra d6 against
vehicles(or anything bigger) and anything with a fixed save. Or even that
they get the extra d6 against any infantry/cavalry if fixed save infantry
should not be considered too thickly armored.
> Peter
> ______________________________________________________________
> ___________
> Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at
http://www.hotmail.com.
Share information about yourself, create your own public profile at
http://profiles.msn.com.
Jyrki Saari
-There is no such thing as free lunch because eating takes time and time is
money.
To unsubscribe send e-mail to: netepic-unsubscribe_at_egroups.com
Received on Fri Sep 01 2000 - 05:56:42 UTC