Re: [NetEpic ML] Imperator troops, save vs Squat rad bomb

From: hellreich <hellreich_at_...>
Date: Tue, 12 Sep 2000 19:44:14 -0400

I know I was just funnin, but for real these air recyclers are not that
great, they malfunction all the time. And I don't care what Government
official say they work, put him in the tank and see if he'll stay there for
the bio blast. Sooner or later you'll have to change the filter and break
the seal. Plus soon or later they just don't work ask the Russians if theirs
worked for that Sub, think not most died before the air ran out from
Radiation poison, explosion also.
----- Original Message -----
From: sparhawk001 <sparhawk001_at_...>
To: <netepic_at_egroups.com>
Sent: Tuesday, September 12, 2000 4:04 PM
Subject: Re: [NetEpic ML] Imperator troops, save vs Squat rad bomb


>
> Just a note on the "air seal" on the tanks, they can breath through air
> recyling as in modern air sealed tanks and ships, for nuclear, bio and
> chemical warfare.
>
> This does not mean that you can use tanks as subs as the recycler would
get
> "drowned". Sorry for the reality injection but it can be done.
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: hellreich <hellreich_at_...>
> To: <netepic_at_egroups.com>
> Sent: Tuesday, September 12, 2000 6:34 PM
> Subject: Re: [NetEpic ML] Imperator troops, save vs Squat rad bomb
>
>
> >
> > NO NO these would be open gun platforms, plus if you give them the save
> then
> > the Capital Imp would get this save also and that would be much to much
> > cheese for any one. Besides the guys would be exposed while firing, and
> this
> > wepon ingnors cover. Plus it states anything even partially under the
> > templete is hit even tanks have air hole this would leak through them.
> Plus
> > lets not fall on GW's poor attempt to put some silly rule like all tanks
> are
> > sealed air tight and inpurveus to out side air, just to make it worth
wild
> > to buy there dumb Rhino model. How would one breath if seald thight,
plus
> if
> > they are seald air thight way can't they move under water? Wow so if I
> take
> > cheap rihnos I'll have submarines also? No more charging for bridges for
> me
> > I'll just move through the water at half rate or full? Is water rough
> > terrain or regular?
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: Peter Ramos <primarch_at_...>
> > To: <netepic_at_egroups.com>
> > Sent: Tuesday, September 12, 2000 12:41 PM
> > Subject: Re: [NetEpic ML] Imperator troops, save vs Squat rad bomb
> >
> >
> > >
> > > Hi!
> > >
> > > But the intepretation from GW days does state they all can in fact
fire.
> I
> > > guess logic dictates that the titan would have radiation shielding,
but
> > that
> > > would make them immune to the rad bomb.
> > >
> > > I can go both ways on this.
> > >
> > > Peter
> > >
> > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > From: <siggi_at_...>
> > > To: <netepic_at_egroups.com>
> > > Sent: Tuesday, September 12, 2000 10:40 AM
> > > Subject: RE: [NetEpic ML] Imperator troops, save vs Squat rad bomb
> > >
> > >
> > > >
> > > > h there!
> > > >
> > > > If you look at the Imperator Titan Datacard you see that there are
> > > > defined locations on then titan where "squads may fire from the
titan"
> > (8
> > > > Location of 25), it does make sense to asume squads in thease 8
> > > location's
> > > > take a hit from Rad bomb but those located inside of the titan are
> safe
> > > > (radiation shielding and stuff like that remenber, if a puny SM is
> safe
> > in
> > > > the most hazardous surounding's it would be safe to asume that the
> > > Imperator
> > > > should be abe to provide the same protection for the personel and
> > troop's
> > > > it's transporting).
> > > >
> > > > ps. You can't place 18 devestators inside the Imperator and expect
> them
> > > all
> > > > to fire out.
> > > >
> > > > Siggi
> > > >
> > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > From: Peter Ramos [mailto:primarch_at_...]
> > > > Sent: 12. september 2000 12:08
> > > > To: netepic_at_egroups.com
> > > > Subject: Re: [NetEpic ML] Imperator troops, save vs Squat rad bomb
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Hi!
> > > >
> > > > It would be reasonable, but too advantageous. There should be a
> > > possibility
> > > > of them getting hurt otherrwise its too easy to stick a heavy
weapons
> > > > company in the Imperator and reek havoc.
> > > >
> > > > Peter
> > > >
> > > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > > From: "Weasel Fierce" <septimus__at_...>
> > > > To: <netepic_at_egroups.com>
> > > > Sent: Tuesday, September 12, 2000 1:48 AM
> > > > Subject: Re: [NetEpic ML] Imperator troops, save vs Squat rad bomb
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > >This is a very good question. I would treat the Imperator in this
> > case
> > > as
> > > > a
> > > > > >building, so yes the rad-bomb would effect the troops carried.
> > > > >
> > > > > Wouldnt it be fair to assume that a mighty imperator would have
some
> > > sort
> > > > of
> > > > > radiation shielding?
> > > > >
> > >
> _________________________________________________________________________
> > > > > Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at
> > > http://www.hotmail.com.
> > > > >
> > > > > Share information about yourself, create your own public profile
at
> > > > > http://profiles.msn.com.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > To unsubscribe send e-mail to: netepic-unsubscribe_at_egroups.com
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > To unsubscribe send e-mail to: netepic-unsubscribe_at_egroups.com
> > > >
> > > > To unsubscribe send e-mail to: netepic-unsubscribe_at_egroups.com
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > > To unsubscribe send e-mail to: netepic-unsubscribe_at_egroups.com
> > >
> > >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Why pay for something you could get for free?
> > NetZero provides FREE Internet Access and Email
> > http://www.netzero.net/download/index.html
> >
> > To unsubscribe send e-mail to: netepic-unsubscribe_at_egroups.com
> >
> >
>
>
> To unsubscribe send e-mail to: netepic-unsubscribe_at_egroups.com
>
>


_____NetZero Free Internet Access and Email______
   http://www.netzero.net/download/index.html
Received on Tue Sep 12 2000 - 23:44:14 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Tue Oct 22 2019 - 10:59:07 UTC