hI!
As far as I can see it is correct and consistent with what has been said so
far.
Peter
----- Original Message -----
From: "warprat" <warprat_at_...>
To: <netepic_at_egroups.com>
Sent: Tuesday, September 12, 2000 10:34 PM
Subject: Re: [NetEpic ML] Imperator troops, save vs Squat rad bomb
>
> Hi Peter!
>
> How would a Rad Bomb be resolved?
>
>
> In the rules it states that everything under the template must save at
> -1. So how does this apply to troops being carried?
>
> I'm inclined to treat this, as we do any other explosion that ignores
> cover.
>
> Infantry:
> 1) Save at -1.
>
> Vehicles:
> 1) Roll the best armor save of the vehicle at -1.
> 2) If the troops bail out, they save at -1.
>
> Titans/Praetorians:
> 1) If the shield is up, no damage possible.
> 2) If the shield is down, roll the best armor location hit, to save.
> 3) If troops are in an armored position, they are safe, just like the
> crew.
> 4) If troops are exposed, they save at -1.
>
>
> Is this correct?
>
> Warprat ;)
>
>
>
>
> Peter Ramos wrote:
>
> > Hi!
> >
> > Looked at the datacard and you are absolutely correct, I'd take your
> > interpretation of which are affected, if they are in firing positions
and
> > shields down then they may be affected.
> >
> > Thanks for clearing that up.
> >
> > Peter
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: <siggi_at_...>
> > To: <netepic_at_egroups.com>
> > Sent: Tuesday, September 12, 2000 1:10 PM
> > Subject: RE: [NetEpic ML] Imperator troops, save vs Squat rad bomb
> >
> > >
> > > Hi!
> > >
> > > My point is that the Datacard identifies locations on the Titan that
> > > if they are occupied by squad that squad can fire from the titan, and
if
> > > they can fire from the titan they can be fired at (if shields are
down)
> > and
> > > therefore Rad bomb will affect them just as if they located in a
building
> > or
> > > trenches.
> > >
> > > If the intepretarion from GW days states that all can fire, then
> > > people have not read the DataCard (Upper right corner where it states
that
> > > Squads in certain location's can fire others can't. It can't be
misprint
> > on
> > > the datacard)
> > >
> > > Ref to the Datacard follows:
> > > http://www.geocities.com/BourbonStreet/Delta/3443/neimpdc1.jpg
> > > http://www.geocities.com/BourbonStreet/Delta/3443/neimpdc2.jpg
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Siggi
> > >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Peter Ramos [mailto:primarch_at_...]
> > > Sent: 12. september 2000 16:42
> > > To: netepic_at_egroups.com
> > > Subject: Re: [NetEpic ML] Imperator troops, save vs Squat rad bomb
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Hi!
> > >
> > > But the intepretation from GW days does state they all can in fact
fire. I
> > > guess logic dictates that the titan would have radiation shielding,
but
> > that
> > > would make them immune to the rad bomb.
> > >
> > > I can go both ways on this.
> > >
> > > Peter
> > >
> > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > From: <siggi_at_...>
> > > To: <netepic_at_egroups.com>
> > > Sent: Tuesday, September 12, 2000 10:40 AM
> > > Subject: RE: [NetEpic ML] Imperator troops, save vs Squat rad bomb
> > >
> > >
> > > >
> > > > h there!
> > > >
> > > > If you look at the Imperator Titan Datacard you see that there are
> > > > defined locations on then titan where "squads may fire from the
titan"
> > (8
> > > > Location of 25), it does make sense to asume squads in thease 8
> > > location's
> > > > take a hit from Rad bomb but those located inside of the titan are
safe
> > > > (radiation shielding and stuff like that remenber, if a puny SM is
safe
> > in
> > > > the most hazardous surounding's it would be safe to asume that the
> > > Imperator
> > > > should be abe to provide the same protection for the personel and
> > troop's
> > > > it's transporting).
> > > >
> > > > ps. You can't place 18 devestators inside the Imperator and expect
them
> > > all
> > > > to fire out.
> > > >
> > > > Siggi
> > > >
> > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > From: Peter Ramos [mailto:primarch_at_...]
> > > > Sent: 12. september 2000 12:08
> > > > To: netepic_at_egroups.com
> > > > Subject: Re: [NetEpic ML] Imperator troops, save vs Squat rad bomb
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Hi!
> > > >
> > > > It would be reasonable, but too advantageous. There should be a
> > > possibility
> > > > of them getting hurt otherrwise its too easy to stick a heavy
weapons
> > > > company in the Imperator and reek havoc.
> > > >
> > > > Peter
> > > >
> > > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > > From: "Weasel Fierce" <septimus__at_...>
> > > > To: <netepic_at_egroups.com>
> > > > Sent: Tuesday, September 12, 2000 1:48 AM
> > > > Subject: Re: [NetEpic ML] Imperator troops, save vs Squat rad bomb
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > >This is a very good question. I would treat the Imperator in this
> > case
> > > as
> > > > a
> > > > > >building, so yes the rad-bomb would effect the troops carried.
> > > > >
> > > > > Wouldnt it be fair to assume that a mighty imperator would have
some
> > > sort
> > > > of
> > > > > radiation shielding?
> > > > >
> > >
_________________________________________________________________________
> > > > > Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at
> > > http://www.hotmail.com.
> > > > >
> > > > > Share information about yourself, create your own public profile
at
> > > > > http://profiles.msn.com.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > To unsubscribe send e-mail to: netepic-unsubscribe_at_egroups.com
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > To unsubscribe send e-mail to: netepic-unsubscribe_at_egroups.com
> > > >
> > > > To unsubscribe send e-mail to: netepic-unsubscribe_at_egroups.com
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > > To unsubscribe send e-mail to: netepic-unsubscribe_at_egroups.com
> > >
> > > To unsubscribe send e-mail to: netepic-unsubscribe_at_egroups.com
> > >
> > >
> >
> > To unsubscribe send e-mail to: netepic-unsubscribe_at_egroups.com
>
> To unsubscribe send e-mail to: netepic-unsubscribe_at_egroups.com
>
>
Received on Wed Sep 13 2000 - 22:01:33 UTC
