RE: [NetEpic ML] Re: Slann defeated! (By a one time only mistake. ..)

From: Karlsen Rune <rune.karlsen_at_...>
Date: Thu, 5 Oct 2000 17:36:25 +0200

Will try it out on saturday.

Rune

-----Original Message-----
From: peter ramos [mailto:ramospeter_at_...]
Sent: 5. oktober 2000 16:15
To: netepic_at_egroups.com
Subject: RE: [NetEpic ML] Re: Slann defeated! (By a one time only
mistake. ..)


Hi!

Have you tried this out, I haven't. Still need to buy the model too.

By the way RAFM made is mecha game called CAV that has pretty cool 12mm
mechs, some would be excellent for the slann.

peter


>From: Karlsen Rune <rune.karlsen_at_...>
>Reply-To: netepic_at_egroups.com
>To: "'netepic_at_egroups.com'" <netepic_at_egroups.com>
>Subject: RE: [NetEpic ML] Re: Slann defeated! (By a one time only mistake.
>..)
>Date: Thu, 5 Oct 2000 16:00:38 +0200
>
>I made it, and i thought id would be too vulnerable with
>only a d6 save.
>
>Rune
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: peter ramos [mailto:ramospeter_at_...]
>Sent: 5. oktober 2000 15:55
>To: netepic_at_egroups.com
>Subject: RE: [NetEpic ML] Re: Slann defeated! (By a one time only
>mistake. ..)
>
>
>Hi!
>
>I see your point. I used it "as is' from whomever created it. I'll look it
>over and see where it should go since it shoud have one.
>
>Peter
>
>
> >>One question though.... maybe I just missed it before.....
> >
> >Any reason why the hull of the razorfang is "stronger" than that of the
> >Kommodo and the Dragon King???? Both the Kommodo and the Dragon King has
> >the
> >Carapace/Warp Jump Generator hit location, while the Razor fang just have

>a
> >Carpace hit location! Is this a type error or is there any particular
> >reason
> >for this? I sure makes the smalest Titan more resiliant than its larger
> >brothers!
> >
> >Nils
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Eivind Borgeteien [SMTP:eivind.borgeteien_at_...]
> > > Sent: 5. oktober 2000 14:56
> > > To: netepic_at_egroups.com
> > > Subject: [NetEpic ML] Re: Slann defeated! (By a one time only
> > > mistake...)
> > >
> > > Hi!
> > >
> > > Glad you liked my battlereport, and I apreciate the feedback given us.
> > >
> > > First of all, to say my SM force was cheesy was bad wording from my
> > > part. What I meant was that this army was the one with the best
> > > chance of beating slann in my gaming group If this army could not
> > > beat slann, no other army in my group would either.
> > >
> > > This is what it is all about for my part, is it possible for any army
> > > in my gaming group to beat slann? I think not. As it turned out, I
> > > won, but only because of Runes mistake. If we play this game once
> > > more I will loose.
> > >
> > > Im not out to force any changes upon the rest of you, but to get a
> > > most possible ballanced Slann army for my gaming group. If the slann
> > > army works for you, it fine, but it dos not quite work for us yet.
> > >
> > > If the slann forces works fine for the rest of you it is time for us
> > > to take the discussion out of the netepic group and do it in private
> > > until we get rules that works in our group. Then we can let you all
> > > know how we are doing.
> > >
> > > Eivind
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --- In netepic_at_egroups.com, "dardman" <dardman_at_n...> wrote:
> > > > Warprat,
> > > > We have play tested the Slann for close to a year now. When we
> > > first started
> > > > they were total cheese and the other player thought they were
> > > great. But
> > > > everyone pointed out the cheesey parts of the army and we set to
> > > fix them.
> > > > The Slann shields were the first things to go and then the mantis
> > > missile
> > > > barrages that could only be fired every other turn and then the
> > > raising of
> > > > points of units.
> > > > If you look at the Slann, they have a wide field of units ranging
> > > from
> > > > infantry to flyers. It depends how you set up your army. The key is
> > > not to
> > > > over do it with the firepower because the Slann need fodder to help
> > > take
> > > > objectives. The mech are great for firepower and if you take a
> > > magus they
> > > > can be even more deadly and be in the enemy's face quickly,
> > > especially if
> > > > you decided to take those long warp jumps (that is what the tadpole
> > > mechs
> > > > are for).
> > > > Playing against them means being able to take a decently balanced
> > > army of
> > > > firepower and fodder.
> > > > Orcs--load up on nobz, nobz bikes and battlewagons to get your boyz
> > > in
> > > > quick.
> > > > Space Marine--make sure you have firepower (land raider company or
> > > > devastator company) with some speed and a titan if possible (he
> > > draws a lot
> > > > of fire).
> > > > Squats-Praetorians, Guild bike brotherhoods and thunderers.
> > > > IG--super heavives, levaithan, titan and a lot of fodder (rough
> > > riders,
> > > > beastmen and bikes).
> > > > Now when we play we don't use flyers because the rules are still a
> > > little
> > > > shakey and we don't have any flyers. So our games are land based
> > > tactics. I
> > > > think the flyers would add a different dimension.
> > > > Hope that helps.
> > > > Darius
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > ____________NetZero Free Internet Access and Email_________
> > > > Download Now http://www.netzero.net/download/index.html
> > > > Request a CDROM 1-800-333-3633
> > > > ___________________________________________________________
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > To unsubscribe send e-mail to: netepic-unsubscribe_at_egroups.com
>
>_________________________________________________________________________
>Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com.
>
>Share information about yourself, create your own public profile at
>http://profiles.msn.com.
>
>
>
>To unsubscribe send e-mail to: netepic-unsubscribe_at_egroups.com

_________________________________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com.

Share information about yourself, create your own public profile at
http://profiles.msn.com.



To unsubscribe send e-mail to: netepic-unsubscribe_at_egroups.com
Received on Thu Oct 05 2000 - 15:36:25 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Tue Oct 22 2019 - 10:59:08 UTC