this is a good way of going about it
----- Original Message -----
From: Peter Ramos <primarch_at_...>
To: <netepic_at_egroups.com>
Sent: Tuesday, October 10, 2000 7:58 PM
Subject: [NetEpic ML] RE: [Net Epic ML] Slann victorious again?
> Hi!
>
> I have come to the conclusion that the scarab cards may be overkill,
perhaps
> just say they ARE part of Necron units keep stats as is and eliminate the
> scarab card. This way Necron assault are tough since they have scarabs
doing
> all this to the enemy.
>
> As for warp jump, Eldar warp spiders have this why shouldn't Necron who
are
> technologically superior? of course I'd add one thing, the danger of being
> lost into the warp like all slann units that have this, the good goes with
> the bad. how does that sound?
>
> Peter
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: warprat [mailto:warprat_at_...]
> Sent: Tuesday, October 10, 2000 7:44 PM
> To: netepic_at_egroups.com
> Subject: Re: [NetEpic ML] Slann victorious again?
>
>
> Hi Hellreich!
>
> Your point about the Bloodletters is, of course, true. But also
> consider that Chaos does not have good long range firepower.
> Bloodletters must make a slow appoach. A stand of them, knocked down to
> regenerate, will stop the whole detachment, due to unit cohesion.
>
> The Necrons, if they retain the jump ability, avoid this problem neatly.
> First Fire, and Snap fire is not allowed against them.
>
> Bloodletters are useless, if they don't get into Close Combat. Almost
> any Marine force can Snap fire against them, limit thier movement, then
> destroy them at range. Also, in order to take the Bloodletters, you
> would also have to purchase a Greater Deamon of Korne. You can't JUST
> buy the Bloodletters like you can the Necrons.
>
> What do you think about the Scarabs? The fluff says they USUALLY
> accompany a Necron force. Do you purchase these for your Necrons
> usually? If not, then I suggest we change the Fluff, or make them
> mandatory.
>
>
> Warprat ;)
>
>
>
>
>
> hellreich wrote:
> >
> > Necron Infantry should not be able to warp jump, they did not have this
> > before and some how it has snuck in. They should be slow moving troops,
> that
> > have to spend points on transports to move fast this is were the messup
> is.
> > As for your math it is a good point be a febble one at that, try this
one
> > and tell me who wins 600 pts of Bloodletters to 600 pts of SM forces.
> these
> > guys are about the same as Necron but they get to regen in CC.
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: warprat <warprat_at_...>
> > To: <netepic_at_egroups.com>
> > Sent: Tuesday, October 10, 2000 6:13 AM
> > Subject: Re: [NetEpic ML] Slann victorious again?
> >
> > > Hi Rune!
> > >
> > > The result is very bad, for the Imperials. Sorry!
> > >
> > >
> > > Warprat ;)
> > >
> > >
> > > Karlsen Rune wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Is the cost unbalanced? If you take 600 points of CC SM forces and
> > > > pitch them against the Necrons, what is the result?
> > > >
> > > > Rune
> > > >
> > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > From: warprat [mailto:warprat_at_...]
> > > > Sent: 10. oktober 2000 11:55
> > > > To: netepic_at_egroups.com
> > > > Subject: Re: [NetEpic ML] Slann victorious again?
> > > >
> > > > Hi Nils!
> > > >
> > > > Are you sure about the regeneration? I was thinking the same thing
as
> > > > you, BUT I couldn't find it in the rules. Anyway, very few Necrons
> were
> > > > killed by CC.
> > > >
> > > > Even if -1 surprise mod is not used, and the Necrons killed in CC do
> not
> > > > regenerate, the end result is unballanced.
> > > >
> > > > Warprat ;)
> > > >
> > > > nils.saugen_at_... wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > Hi,
> > > > >
> > > > > Two points, first Necrons killed in CC doesn't regenerate,
secondly
> > > > > Hellreich/Darius mentioned thet the -1 to CAF modifyer for units
> > charged
> > > > by
> > > > > mechs popping out of the warp, was due to the size of the mech! So
> we
> > have
> > > > > do not apply that penalty to units charget by warping Necron
Assault
> > > > > warriors.
> > > > >
> > > > > Nils
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > > To unsubscribe send e-mail to: netepic-unsubscribe_at_egroups.com
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > To unsubscribe send e-mail to: netepic-unsubscribe_at_egroups.com
> > >
> > >
> > > To unsubscribe send e-mail to: netepic-unsubscribe_at_egroups.com
> > >
> > >
> >
> > _____NetZero Free Internet Access and Email______
> > http://www.netzero.net/download/index.html
> >
> >
> > To unsubscribe send e-mail to: netepic-unsubscribe_at_egroups.com
>
>
> To unsubscribe send e-mail to: netepic-unsubscribe_at_egroups.com
>
>
>
>
> To unsubscribe send e-mail to: netepic-unsubscribe_at_egroups.com
>
>
_______________________________________________
Why pay for something you could get for free?
NetZero provides FREE Internet Access and Email
http://www.netzero.net/download/index.html
Received on Wed Oct 11 2000 - 00:40:19 UTC