Hi!
<groan> It IS very difficult. The game mechanic does not give much le-way
because the CAF values are setup for stand-to-stand close combat not as a
group.
To limit one detachment assaulting one detachment is also a bad idea because
sometimes its useful to pin more than one detachment with one detachemnt or
mob, so thats not the way either.
hmmm.. most of the ideas I come up with invlove to much change or the rules.
Unless someone has a burst of genius on this, I'm stuck!
Peter
>We might say that one detachment, no matter what the size, can only charge
>one detachment. This leads to (at least) one problem, however, I can see a
>whole clan of Orks being forced to charge an aspect warrior unit...
>Although
>it is kind of Orky (Awright, ladz, now we give dose pansies a a good
>stomping, WAAAGHHHH!). Maybe an addition that if the charging detachment
>outnumbers the charged by more than 2:1 then it can charge multiple
>detachments.
>
>Damn, this is surprisingly difficult.
>
>As for the pairing, I experimented with a method, but unfortunately it
>requires some _bookkeeping_ to determine who is in CC with who, so there's
>got to be a better way to do it. C'mon, people. Get those little gray cells
>processing ;-)
>
>
> >
> > Luca Lettieri
> >
> >
> > -------------------------- eGroups Sponsor
> > -------------------------~-~>
> > Tellme Sports. Tellme Stocks. Tellme News. Just Tellme.
> > Call 1-800-555-TELL and hear everything. For info visit:
> > http://click.egroups.com/1/9529/6/_/7255/_/971877693/
> > --------------------------------------------------------------
> > -------_->
> >
> > To unsubscribe send e-mail to: netepic-unsubscribe_at_egroups.com
> >
>
>
>Jyrki Saari
>
>-There is no such thing as free lunch because eating takes time and time is
>money.
_________________________________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at
http://www.hotmail.com.
Share information about yourself, create your own public profile at
http://profiles.msn.com.
Received on Thu Oct 19 2000 - 13:30:07 UTC