Re: [NetEpic ML] Warmonger Playtesting from Daniel

From: Peter Ramos <primarch_at_...>
Date: Mon, 13 Nov 2000 21:17:35 -0500

Hi!

Having tried many rule interpretations I have to agree with your assessment. It WILL increase the survivability of titans without taking the sting of anti-titan weapons.

I will put up the poll soon, I dont think it needs much testing sounds like its been getting a lot for years from Ed's group and a lot of others I know.

Peter

  ----- Original Message -----
  From: hellreich
  To: netepic_at_egroups.com
  Sent: Monday, November 13, 2000 9:01 PM
  Subject: Re: [NetEpic ML] Warmonger Playtesting from Daniel


  works great and makes them well worth their price, turns SH into great buys at their cost, and how is 15 years of testing with no grips in our group at all. Been the way we have played since I started playing just interrupted the rule in this manor.
    ----- Original Message -----
    From: Daniel Wolf
    To: netepic_at_egroups.com
    Sent: Monday, November 13, 2000 2:11 PM
    Subject: Re: [NetEpic ML] Warmonger Playtesting from Daniel


    Hi!

    When we use it the way as hellreich said, it will make titans and praetorians much better!
    I think it's worth some playtesting.

    So far from me....
    Dan Wolf

      ----- Original Message -----
      From: Peter Ramos
      To: netepic_at_egroups.com
      Sent: Sunday, November 12, 2000 11:31 PM
      Subject: Re: [NetEpic ML] Warmonger Playtesting from Daniel


      Hi!

      I would not mind using Hellriech's interpretation for all titans regarding damaging and already damaged location. However remember that weapons would add their bonus OR the bonus for second and subsequent hits whichever is higher.

      I would like to hear other opinions on this point.

      Peter
        Hi!

        Sorry in the rule book v3.0, v4.0 and v4.1 it's stated as i said it. Look at this example:

        Quote Rulebook:
        Example: A Warlord Titan receives a penetrating hit to the reactor; the first roll for damage is a two, meaning the reactor is off line. A second penetrating hit again hits the reactor; the second roll is a 3. This second roll is added to the first 2 + 3 = 5, the total is the new damage level. This means that the reactor explodes destroying the Titan (the effect stated for a damage roll of 5).
         
         
        But i have to say that i like your way of interpretation. When it'S used this way, then a roll of a d3 is perfectly ok.
         
        Mhhhh..... What does our GrandMaster Peter say?
         
         
        Bye
        Dan Wolf


    To unsubscribe send e-mail to: netepic-unsubscribe_at_egroups.com


        eGroups Sponsor
       

  To unsubscribe send e-mail to: netepic-unsubscribe_at_egroups.com
Received on Tue Nov 14 2000 - 02:17:35 UTC