RE: [NetEpic ML] Another question

From: <jyrki.saari_at_...>
Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2001 10:29:47 +0200

> -----Original Message-----
> From: ext Karlsen Rune [mailto:rune.karlsen_at_...]
> Sent: 10. January 2001 16:16
> To: 'netepic_at_egroups.com'
> Subject: RE: [NetEpic ML] Another question
>
>
> I agree completely with this. I have an alternative rule which would
> minimize die rolling, but
> still put a semblance of realism into morale and breaking
> issues. This is my
> suggestion :
>
> When broken, and a successful morale check is rolled,
> consider the remaining
> units as
> a "new" card with the same stats, but now with new BP's
> consistant with the
> 50% rule
> (or 75% in case of the squats). When the casualties to this
> "new" unit once
> again
> reaches its new BP, roll for morale again. This will make it
> increasingly
> difficult to
> keep small broken forces on the table.
>
> Example :
>
> Slann Gravguards, 16 stands, BP 8 (When broken, 8 stands will remain)
> These 8 stands will compose the "new" card, and will in
> accordance with
> the 50% rule get a BP of 4. If 4 more Slann stands are killed, 4 will
> remain,
> and a morale check is forced. If the check is made, the new
> BP will be 2,
> and killing 2 more Slann forces a new morale check.
>
> What do you think of this?
>
> Rune
>

Better. MUCH better. I could live with this one.


Jyrki Saari

-There is no such thing as free lunch because eating takes time and time is
money.
Received on Thu Jan 11 2001 - 08:29:47 UTC