Re: [NetEpic ML] Re: Greater Daemon movement

From: Peter Ramos <primarch_at_...>
Date: Fri, 09 Feb 2001 22:17:44 -0500

Hi!

hehe, this proves my point. Might as well make it official.

Peter

trygve_at_... wrote:

> Sounds good to me! That's the way we've been playing anyway...
>
> Trygve
>
>> Hi!
>>
>> Technically speaking yes. Of course you know what the problem is,
>
> the models
>
>> are horribly out of scale and look plain silly inside a building.
>>
>> The resolution in most groups (if not all) is that they may NOT
>
> enter
>
>> buildings but move through any other terrain like infantry.
>>
>> I guess we should insert that into their description, since no one
>
> really
>
>> allows them to enter because it looks "funny"
>>
>> What say others?
>>
>> Peter
>>
>>
>>> From: trygve_at_n...
>>> Reply-To: netepic_at_y...
>>> To: netepic_at_y...
>>> Subject: [NetEpic ML] Greater Daemon movement
>>> Date: Fri, 09 Feb 2001 13:13:08 -0000
>>>
>>> The rules state that "All Greater Daemons (except the Plague Tower)
>>> count as knights/ super heavy vehicles for pinning, but count as
>>> infantry for movement restrictions". Does this mean that GD's can
>>> enter buldings and the likes just like an infantry unit can?
>>>
>>> Trygve
>>>
>> _________________________________________________________________
>> Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com
>
>
>
>
> To unsubscribe send e-mail to: netepic-unsubscribe_at_egroups.com
>
>
>
Received on Sat Feb 10 2001 - 03:17:44 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Tue Oct 22 2019 - 10:59:15 UTC