And, I'm still pretty sure!!!! :)
-----Original Message-----
From: Trygve Bjørnstad [mailto:trygve_at_...]
Sent: 5. mars 2001 11:16
To: netepic_at_yahoogroups.com
Subject: RE: [NetEpic ML] Titan CC
Nils was, I hadn't been part of that discussion...
Trygve
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Karlsen Rune [mailto:rune.karlsen_at_...]
> Sent: 5. mars 2001 08:31
> To: 'netepic_at_yahoogroups.com'
> Subject: RE: [NetEpic ML] Titan CC
>
>
> Hi!
>
> Thanks for clarifying this. Nils and Trygve (who played
> the united chaos forces) were 100% sure that i didnt
> get a save. There was some talk about an article
> posted here or something. I dont remember, i was
> really tired after having played for 14 hours...
> Nils being a more experienced player than
> me, i caved in. Of course, im sure Nils didnt intend
> to cheat me, but im rather pissed at him none the less...
>
> Rune
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Peter Ramos [mailto:primarch_at_...]
> > Sent: 4. mars 2001 18:19
> > To: netepic_at_yahoogroups.com
> > Subject: Re: [NetEpic ML] Titan CC
> >
> >
> > Hi!
> >
> > First of all, the necron titan has no shields so I assume you are
> > referring to it self-repair ability. The self-repair cannot
> > be bypassed
> > by any poer/rule I am aware of. So after you get hit and
> > determine hit
> > location, it would get its self repair. The bottom line is
> > this IS its
> > defense against some weapons since they negate his armor
> > save. So on a
> > 3+ you ignore the beam of power. Most armies have at least
> > one weapons
> > like this. During my game with Darius his squat cyclops weapon acted
> > like a "beam of power", my only defense was its self repair
> > and that was
> > at 4+, but still made it. A 3+ fixed repair roll goes a long
> > way against
> > this.
> >
> > My curiousity is why it was rules that you were not entitled
> > to a repair
> > save? Whats the rational? Nothing it epic negates
> > repair/regeneration,
> > besides close combat.
> >
> > Peter
> >
> > Karlsen Rune wrote:
> >
> > > Hi!
> > >
> > > A question about this. The Chaos Primarch Magnus the Red
> > has a physical
> > > psychic
> > > attack, 2+ -6 100cms range, +3 damage on
> > titans/praetorians. Now, this
> > > wouldnt
> > > be so bad if one had shields, but according to our chaos
> > opponents, the
> > > repair
> > > shield function of the Necron Titan doesnt work against
> > this. The result is,
> > > on a hit
> > > on any location (which isnt hard, just roll a 2+ and point
> > at the middle),
> > > the titan
> > > gets a save at 7+ (at best). The roll of the damage die has
> > to be 3 to
> > > destroy the
> > > titan. My question is, do you think this is fair? A below
> > average roll will
> > > always
> > > destroy the Necron titan. According to our esteemed chaos
> > players, i didnt
> > > get the 3+ psy save, because it was a physcial psychic
> > attack, and i didnt
> > > get the 3+ shield repair (this had apparently been resolved
> > some months ago
> > > in some discussion or other with Darius, i dont know which
> > one). I thought
> > > Physical psychic attacks was some kind of force attacking
> > your person,
> > > like a weapon, on psychic in origin. Now, if thats so, how
> > come i didnt get
> > > my 3+ shield save?
> > > Now, the titan costs 750 points, and Magnus costs 300. Do the math.
> > >
> > > Rune
> > >
> > >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Peter Ramos [mailto:primarch_at_...]
> > > Sent: 2. mars 2001 14:19
> > > To: netepic_at_yahoogroups.com
> > > Subject: Re: [NetEpic ML] Titan CC
> > >
> > >
> > > Hi!
> > >
> > > You are correct I did mention that. Please edit the titan's
> > template to
> > > reflect that. The psy save is 3+, like all other slann titans.
> > >
> > > Peter
> > >
> > > Trygve Bjørnstad wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > I thought Peter mentioned a save of 3+, but maybee this was
> > against normal
> > > attacks?
> > >
> > > Trygve
> > >
> > >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Karlsen Rune [ mailto:rune.karlsen_at_...
> > > <mailto:rune.karlsen_at_...> ]
> > > Sent: 2. mars 2001 09:20
> > > To: ' netepic_at_yahoogroups.com <mailto:netepic_at_yahoogroups.com> '
> > > Subject: RE: [NetEpic ML] Titan CC
> > >
> > >
> > > It probably should..
> > >
> > > Rune
> > >
> > >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: nils.saugen_at_... <mailto:nils.saugen@...> [
> > > mailto:nils.saugen_at_seb.se <mailto:nils.saugen@...> ]
> > > Sent: 2. mars 2001 09:01
> > > To: netepic_at_yahoogroups.com <mailto:netepic_at_yahoogroups.com>
> > > Subject: RE: [NetEpic ML] Titan CC
> > >
> > >
> > > Hmmm, my guess is that it ought to have a psychic savingthrow
> > > of 4+ versus
> > > non physical psychic attacks.!
> > >
> > > ..!
> > >
> > > ...
> > >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Karlsen Rune [ mailto:rune.karlsen_at_...
> > > <mailto:rune.karlsen_at_...> ]
> > > Sent: 2. mars 2001 08:53
> > > To: ' netepic_at_yahoogroups.com <mailto:netepic_at_yahoogroups.com> '
> > > Subject: RE: [NetEpic ML] Titan CC
> > >
> > >
> > > Nope, not that im aware of. It doesnt say, and it
> > > has no shields, so it in effect has no defence against
> > > this...
> > >
> > > Rune
> > >
> > >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: nils.saugen_at_... <mailto:nils.saugen@...> [
> > > mailto:nils.saugen_at_... <mailto:nils.saugen@...> ]
> > > Sent: 2. mars 2001 08:46
> > > To: netepic_at_yahoogroups.com <mailto:netepic_at_yahoogroups.com>
> > > Subject: RE: [NetEpic ML] Titan CC
> > >
> > >
> > > The Necron Titan has a saving throw versu!
> > >
> > > s!
> > >
> > > non physical
> > >
> > > psychic saves
> > >
> > > doesn't it?
> > >
> > > Nils
> > >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Karlsen Rune [ mailto:rune.karlsen_at_...
> > > <mailto:rune.karlsen_at_...> ]
> > > Sent: 2. mars 2001 08:36
> > > To: ' netepic_at_yahoogroups.com <mailto:netepic@...m> '
> > > Subject: [NetEpic ML] Titan CC
> > >
> > >
> > > Hi!
> > >
> > > Can someone please summarise the rules for how infantry etc.
> > > attack Titans? It'd be great with a clarification :)
> > >
> > > Also, is it possible for chaos to take over robots/necrons with
> > > their power? Dont remember what its called, but it allows
> > > it to take over "any unit" within 25cms. When you can put
> > > the buggers in rhino's and charge 50cms with them in
> > > the first round, 25cms is alot, and affecting any unit then
> > > is just downright cheesy. It would mean f.ex, that
> > > the Necron !
> > >
> > > Ti!
> > >
> > > tan (which has no shields) could be
> > > taken over without a save. Now, thats just plain
> > > old Jarlsberg im smelling! :)
> > > Also, the chaos rot power says it affects all units.
> > > Were these cards made before Praetorians/Titans came
> > > into the picture? Once again, you charge your legion
> > > 50cms, and everything within 15cms of it has to
> > > save or die when the power is used. Everything!
> > > Now, in a large battle, say 10k, this will be devastating.
> > > Im sure the rot is really the reek of really old, moldy cheese ;)
> > > Id like some clarifications on the chaos powers, and
> > > what they can and cant do please :)
> > >
> > > Rune
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > To unsubscribe send e-mail to: netepic-unsubscribe_at_egroups.com
> > > <mailto:netepic-unsubscribe_at_egroups.com>
> > >
> > > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to
> > >
> > > http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
> > <http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/>
> > > To unsubscribe send e-mail to: netepic-unsubscribe_at_egroups.com
> > > <mailto:netepic-unsubscribe_at_egroups.com>
> > >
> > > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to
> > > http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
> > <http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/>
> > >
> > >
> > > To unsubscribe send e-mail to: netepic-unsubscribe_at_egroups.com
> > > <mailto:netepic-unsubscribe_at_egroups.com>
> > >
> > > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to
> > > http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
> > <http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/>
> > >
> > >
> > > To unsubscribe send e-mail to: netepic-unsubscribe_at_egroups.com
> > > <mailto:netepic-unsubscribe_at_egroups.com>
> > >
> > > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to
> > > http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
> > <http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/>
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > To unsubscribe send e-mail to: netepic-unsubscribe_at_egroups.com
> > > <mailto:netepic-unsubscribe_at_egroups.com>
> > >
> > > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to
> > http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
> > > <http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/>
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > To unsubscribe send e-mail to: netepic-unsubscribe_at_egroups.com
> > > <mailto:netepic-unsubscribe_at_egroups.com>
> > >
> > > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to
> > http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
> > > <http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/>
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
> > >
> > >
> > <http://rd.yahoo.com/M=182283.1338155.2932296.1172315/D=egroup
> > mail/S=1700059
> > >
> > 081:N/A=597630/*http://www.airforce.com/cgi-bin/media/setmedia
> > .cgi?media=YH1
> > > 2Q201> AirForce.com
> > >
> > >
> > <http://us.adserver.yahoo.com/l?M=182283.1338155.2932296.11723
> 15/D=egroupmai
> > l/S=1700059081:N/A=597630/rand=164422385>
> >
> > To unsubscribe send e-mail to: netepic-unsubscribe_at_egroups.com
> >
> > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service
> > <http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/> .
> >
> >
> >
> > To unsubscribe send e-mail to: netepic-unsubscribe_at_egroups.com
> >
> > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>
>
>
>
To unsubscribe send e-mail to: netepic-unsubscribe_at_egroups.com
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
To unsubscribe send e-mail to: netepic-unsubscribe_at_egroups.com
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
To unsubscribe send e-mail to: netepic-unsubscribe_at_egroups.com
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
Received on Mon Mar 05 2001 - 10:25:03 UTC