Hi!
The conqueror should now be 250 points, this is what the stormblade is
worth, that one has more firepowwer, but it balances with the necron
self repair.
Th annihilator should be worth about 400 points now.
The old prices were for 4 attack dice and 8 respectively, granted it was
a bit much. The lesser dice are still powerful but the price HAS to come
down since it was originally calculated at the higher attack dice.
Please make the change in the beta-version.
Peter
Karlsen Rune wrote:
> Ok :)
>
> That makes the Conqueror somewhat costly though...
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Peter Ramos [mailto:primarch_at_...]
> Sent: 5. mars 2001 18:32
> To: netepic_at_yahoogroups.com
> Subject: Re: [NetEpic ML] Anihilator Battlefortress
>
>
> Hi!
>
> It seems there may be a typo, the conqueror should have two attack dice and
> the annihilator 2 of those turrets for a total of 4 attack dice.
>
> Well..I did say there were typos....<grin>
>
> Peter
>
> Karlsen Rune wrote:
>
>
> 4 certain hits? haha, do you remember my rolls? :)
> I didnt kill one unit in the first round with either
> of the Conquerors :)
>
> As the titan is now, its overpriced. Nils ran it
> through the cost formula, and came up with 450 points...
> I dont know what the cost should be, but somewhere
> around that sounds fair.
>
> Rune
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Trygve Bj�rnstad [ mailto:trygve_at_... <mailto:trygve@...>
> ]
> Sent: 5. mars 2001 17:14
> To: netepic_at_yahoogroups.com <mailto:netepic_at_yahoogroups.com>
> Subject: RE: [NetEpic ML] Anihilator Battlefortress
>
>
> I think the Conqueror is okay with 4 attacks (although 4
> "certain" hits
> at -1d6 is a real pain:)), but I'm not too happy with the
> titan having 4
> attacks at 100cm. After all it is a "small and fast" titan,
> and shouldn't
> have this kind of range... But the cost as is might be a bit
> too high...
>
> Trygve
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Karlsen Rune [ mailto:rune.karlsen_at_...
> <mailto:rune.karlsen_at_...> ]
> Sent: 5. mars 2001 14:50
> To: ' netepic_at_yahoogroups.com <mailto:netepic_at_yahoogroups.com> '
> Subject: RE: [NetEpic ML] Anihilator Battlefortress
>
>
> Hi!
>
> The Necron Titan has the same weapon, and has only
> 2 attacks. I dont know what the original intention
> was, but at 350 for a Conqueror, 4 attacks are
> not unwarranted. I would not like to see the Slann
> reduced even more, and i feel most of their units
> are pretty well priced as is (except perhaps
> the necron knights and titan, which are imo
> overpriced, but this will have to be playtested
> further). It seems to me that we have been busy
> downgrading alot of Slann forces lately, so
> a little upgrade would be welcome, as long
> as the prices are adjusted (The battlefortress
> would have to cost more of course). The Necron
> titan might be worth 750 points if it had 4
> attacks instead of 2 with the Conversion Beamer
> Cannon. This would also have to be calculated.
>
> Rune
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: nils.saugen_at_... <mailto:nils.saugen@...> [
> mailto:nils.saugen_at_... <mailto:nils.saugen@...> ]
> Sent: 5. mars 2001 14:31
> To: netepic_at_yahoogroups.com <mailto:netepic_at_yahoogroups.com>
> Subject: [NetEpic ML] Anihilator Battlefortress
>
>
> Hi,
>
> Just somting I was wondering about.
>
> The Conquror and the Anihilator have the same number of
> attacks with their
> Conversion Beamer Cannon. However, the Anihilator has two
> turrets as opposed
> to one for the conquror. I Would argue that the Anihilator
> the ought to have
> more attacks with it's two turrets than the Conquror.
>
> As I see it there are three options:
> * Leave as is.
> * Increase the number of attacks for the Anihilator.
> * Decrease the number of attacks for the Conquror.
> !
>
> Nils
>
> To unsubscribe send e-mail to: netepic-unsubscribe_at_egroups.com
> <mailto:netepic-unsubscribe_at_egroups.com>
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to
> http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ <http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/>
>
>
>
> To unsubscribe send e-mail to: netepic-unsubscribe_at_egroups.com
> <mailto:netepic-unsubscribe_at_egroups.com>
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to
>
> http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ <http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/>
>
> To unsubscribe send e-mail to: netepic-unsubscribe_at_egroups.com
> <mailto:netepic-unsubscribe_at_egroups.com>
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to
> http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ <http://docs.y! ah!oo.com/info/terms/>
>
>
>
>
> To unsubscribe send e-mail to: netepic-unsubscribe_at_egroups.com
> <mailto:netepic-unsubscribe_at_egroups.com>
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
> <http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
>
> <http://rd.yahoo.com/M=182283.1338155.2932296/D=egroupmail/S=1700059081:N/A=
> 597632/*http://www.airforce.com/cgi-bin/media/setmedia.cgi?media=YH02Q201>
> AirForce.com
>
> <http://us.adserver.yahoo.com/l?M=182283.1338155.2932296/D=egroupmail/S=1700
> 059081:N/A=597632/rand=242570743>
>
> To unsubscribe send e-mail to: netepic-unsubscribe_at_egroups.com
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service
> <http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/> .
>
>
> To unsubscribe send e-mail to: netepic-unsubscribe_at_egroups.com
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>
>
>
>
Received on Mon Mar 05 2001 - 21:11:36 UTC