Re: [NetEpic ML] Conflicting Rules

From: Hellreich <helreich_at_...>
Date: Mon, 5 Mar 2001 20:01:24 -0800

whe it comes to a card to force a testr then even units that normally do not
have to take a test still have to test. Like a SM Commander never has to
test for morale. but if hit with a chaos power that calls for a morale test
he still has to take one.
----- Original Message -----
From: <nils.saugen_at_...>
To: <netepic_at_yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Monday, March 05, 2001 5:08 AM
Subject: [NetEpic ML] Conflicting Rules


> Hi,
>
> This Topic is a real pain for me. There are rules that come into conflict
> with each other, most often these revolve around moral testes.
>
> For instance if you include a Confessor in a detachment, the rules state
> that that detachement he joins won't make a moral check for any reason.
Then
> you have Chaos powers that state that every unit, even those that normaly
> don't take moral tests, should make a moral test. There are several
excaples
> of this "Conflict of Moral", which rule should take presidens?
>
> Nils
>
> To unsubscribe send e-mail to: netepic-unsubscribe_at_egroups.com
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>
Received on Tue Mar 06 2001 - 04:01:24 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Tue Oct 22 2019 - 10:59:18 UTC