Re: [NetEpic ML] Anihilator Battlefortress

From: Hellreich <helreich_at_...>
Date: Tue, 6 Mar 2001 06:42:06 -0800

UUUggg, that was a waste, they are like a one use weapon that needs to go right for one Deamon. Since the deamon can not use a card to save from their attack. It really put a damper on Chaos players plans. They should be use like a warp missle for a titan.
  ----- Original Message -----
  From: Trygve Bj�rnstad
  To: netepic_at_yahoogroups.com
  Sent: Tuesday, March 06, 2001 3:00 AM
  Subject: RE: [NetEpic ML] Anihilator Battlefortress


  The grey knights were there... hiding in a building :)

  Trygve
    -----Original Message-----
    From: Peter Ramos [mailto:primarch_at_...]
    Sent: 6. mars 2001 03:26
    To: netepic_at_yahoogroups.com
    Subject: Re: [NetEpic ML] Anihilator Battlefortress


    Hi!

    Good point, grey knights are great for deterant value, two units in a game that big makes a BIG difference.

    Peter

    Hellreich wrote:

Nay the cost is fine, He should have gotten his save since it is a PhysicalNON psyhic attack. This would have made a big difference. Plus if he hadtaken Kroxigors instead of assault Tin cans he would of negated all yourarua powers, and been able to fight you toe to toe. It seems the SM playerhad failed to take the Grey Knights witch when fighting Chaos also need tobe taken. This would have made a huge differance in game play. Mostly thehide the Deamon trick dose not work to well when this unit pops up out of nowhere in the deamons face.----- Original Message -----From: "Trygve Bj�rnstad" <trygve_at_...>To: <netepic_at_yahoogroups.com>Sent: Monday, March 05, 2001 8:14 AMSubject: R!
E: [NetEpic ML] Anihilator Battlefortress
I think the Conqueror is okay with 4 attacks (although 4 "certain" hitsat -1d6 is a real pain:)), but I'm not too happy with the titan having 4attacks at 100cm. After all it is a "small and fast" titan, and shouldn'thave this kind of range... But the cost as is might be a bit too high...Trygve
-----Original Message-----From: Karlsen Rune [mailto:rune.karlsen_at_...]Sent: 5. mars 2001 14:50To: 'netepic_at_yahoogroups.com'Subject: RE: [NetEpic ML] Anihilator BattlefortressHi!The Necron Titan has the same weapon, and has only2 attacks. I dont know what the original intentionwas, but at 350 for a Conqueror, 4 attacks arenot unwarranted. I would not like to see the Slannre!
duced even more, and i feel most of their unitsare pretty well priced as is (except perhapsthe necron knights and titan, which are imooverpriced, but this will have to be playtestedfurther). It seems to me that we have been busydowngrading alot of Slann forces lately, soa little upgrade would be welcome, as longas the prices are adjusted (The battlefortresswould have to cost more of course). The Necrontitan might be worth 750 points if it had 4attacks instead of 2 with the Conversion BeamerCannon. This would also have to be calculated.Rune
-----Original Message-----From: nils.saugen_at_... [mailto:nils.saugen_at_...]Sent: 5. mars 2001 14:31To: netepic@!
yahoogroups.comSubject: [NetEpic ML] Anihilator BattlefortressHi,Just somting I was wondering about.The Conquror and the Anihilator have the same number ofattacks with theirConversion Beamer Cannon. However, the Anihilator has twoturrets as opposedto one for the conquror. I Would argue that the Anihilatorthe ought to havemore attacks with it's two turrets than the Conquror.As I see it there are three options:* Leave as is.* Increase the number of attacks for the Anihilator.* Decrease the number of attacks for the Conquror.NilsTo unsubscribe send e-mail to: netepic-unsubscribe_at_egroups.comYour use of Yahoo! Groups is subject tohttp://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
To unsubs!
cribe send e-mail to: netepic-unsubscribe_at_egroups.comYour use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
To unsubscribe send e-mail to: netepic-unsubscribe_at_egroups.comYour use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
To unsubscribe send e-mail to: netepic-unsubscribe_at_egroups.com Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/



    To unsubscribe send e-mail to: netepic-unsubscribe_at_egroups.com

    Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.


        Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
       
       

  To unsubscribe send e-mail to: netepic-unsubscribe_at_egroups.com

  Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
Received on Tue Mar 06 2001 - 14:42:06 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Tue Oct 22 2019 - 10:59:18 UTC