I guess we should put that in the Preatorian rules as well then?
How about Superheavies?
T
> -----Original Message-----
> From: eivind.borgeteien_at_... [mailto:eivind.borgeteien@...]
> Sent: 28. mai 2001 14:05
> To: netepic_at_yahoogroups.com
> Subject: RE: RE: [NetEpic ML] Unbalanced armies?
> Sensitivity: Confidential
>
>
> On page 30 of the core rules, under the heading "Titans and Close
> Combat" it says:
>
> "If the loser is a Titan or Praetorian, the winner then chooses a
> location on the opponent and rolls for damage"
>
> Eivind
> >
> > Fra: Trygve Bj�rnstad <trygve_at_...>
> > Dato: 2001/05/28 Mon PM 01:54:33 CEST
> > Til: <netepic_at_yahoogroups.com>
> > Emne: RE: RE: [NetEpic ML] Unbalanced armies?
> >
> > But where does it say that??? I've been looking "everywhere" and I just
> > can't find it...
> >
> > Trygve
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Karlsen Rune [mailto:rune.karlsen_at_...]
> > > Sent: 28. mai 2001 13:13
> > > To: 'netepic_at_yahoogroups.com'
> > > Subject: RE: RE: [NetEpic ML] Unbalanced armies?
> > > Sensitivity: Confidential
> > >
> > >
> > > But that doesnt mean that the templates don't work
> > > in CC, it just means Praetorians do not have the
> > > infantry defence system of the titans. That's why
> > > they have a zillion bolters instead:)
> > >
> > > Rune
> > >
> > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > From: eivind.borgeteien_at_...
> [mailto:eivind.borgeteien_at_...]
> > > > Sent: 28. mai 2001 12:51
> > > > To: netepic_at_yahoogroups.com
> > > > Subject: RE: RE: [NetEpic ML] Unbalanced armies?
> > > > Sensitivity: Confidential
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Its the environmental issue of leadpoisioning the
> > > > countryside. The overextencive use of bolterfire has lead to
> > > > the intoduction of titan electrohull on praetorians in non
> > > > EC-countries :-)
> > > >
> > > > No, just kidding.
> > > >
> > > > You are right..
> > > >
> > > > Eivind
> > > > >
> > > > > Fra: Trygve Bj�rnstad <trygve_at_...>
> > > > > Dato: 2001/05/28 Mon PM 12:36:37 CEST
> > > > > Til: <netepic_at_yahoogroups.com>
> > > > > Emne: RE: RE: [NetEpic ML] Unbalanced armies?
> > > > >
> > > > > Okay, if I am wrong, could you please fill me in with what
> > > > I've missed?
> > > > >
> > > > > T
> > > > >
> > > > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > > > From: eivind.borgeteien_at_...
> > > > [mailto:eivind.borgeteien_at_...]
> > > > > > Sent: 28. mai 2001 12:22
> > > > > > To: netepic_at_yahoogroups.com
> > > > > > Subject: RE: RE: [NetEpic ML] Unbalanced armies?
> > > > > > Sensitivity: Confidential
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Well, actually, you are!
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Since we are not members of the European Community, that rule
> > > > > > does not apply to games played in Norway. This is to protect
> > > > > > Norwegian special interessts and settlements on our coastline
> > > > > > north of Trondheim....
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Eivind
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Fra: Trygve Bj�rnstad <trygve_at_...>
> > > > > > > Dato: 2001/05/28 Mon AM 11:54:37 CEST
> > > > > > > Til: <netepic_at_yahoogroups.com>
> > > > > > > Emne: RE: RE: [NetEpic ML] Unbalanced armies?
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > The rules say this:
> > > > > > > "Due to their size and slow speed they are vulnerable
> > > > to close combat by
> > > > > > > lesser units. Close combat with Praetorians is
> > > > resolved in the normal
> > > > > > > fashion as described under the close combat rules section. The
> > > > > > special close
> > > > > > > combat rules for Titans do not apply to Praetorians."
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > The way I read "do not" is that they actually "do not" follow
> > > > > > titan rules,
> > > > > > > but I could of course be wrong... :)
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Trygve
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > > > > > From: eivind.borgeteien_at_...
> > > > [mailto:eivind.borgeteien_at_...]
> > > > > > > > Sent: 28. mai 2001 11:53
> > > > > > > > To: netepic_at_yahoogroups.com
> > > > > > > > Subject: Sv: RE: [NetEpic ML] Unbalanced armies?
> > > > > > > > Sensitivity: Confidential
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > No thats not correct.
> > > > > > > > The templates should be used on all units that have them...
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Eivind
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Fra: nils.saugen_at_...
> > > > > > > > > Dato: 2001/05/28 Mon AM 10:15:02 CEST
> > > > > > > > > Til: netepic_at_yahoogroups.com
> > > > > > > > > Emne: RE: [NetEpic ML] Unbalanced armies?
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Old discussion really, we don't use the templates
> in CC for
> > > > > > other than
> > > > > > > > > Titans. This is probably not correct as by net epic
> > > > standard.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Nils
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > > > > > > From: Karlsen Rune [mailto:rune.karlsen_at_...]
> > > > > > > > > Sent: 28. mai 2001 09:44
> > > > > > > > > To: 'netepic_at_yahoogroups.com'
> > > > > > > > > Subject: RE: [NetEpic ML] Unbalanced armies?
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > I dont think we use the damage templates correctly in CC.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Rune
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > > > > > > From: Trygve Bj�rnstad [mailto:trygve_at_...]
> > > > > > > > > Sent: 28. mai 2001 09:31
> > > > > > > > > To: netepic_at_yahoogroups.com
> > > > > > > > > Subject: RE: [NetEpic ML] Unbalanced armies?
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > It worked fine against the squat colossus the last
> > > > time I tried :)
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Trygve
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > > > > > > From: Peter Ramos [mailto:primarch_at_...]
> > > > > > > > > Sent: 25. mai 2001 15:33
> > > > > > > > > To: netepic_at_yahoogroups.com
> > > > > > > > > Subject: Re: [NetEpic ML] Unbalanced armies?
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Hi!
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > I remember the jugger tactic was good in the old days, but
> > > > > > > > praetorians have
> > > > > > > > > first fire and a template now so does it still
> work as well?
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Peter
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Trygve Bj�rnstad wrote:
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > I've never faced the nids, but I quite enjoy
> spanking squats
> > > > > > > > with my chaos
> > > > > > > > > army.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > I tend to field a fast-moving chaos army, moving in on the
> > > > > > > > little guys and
> > > > > > > > > unleashing the chaos powers. Especially my old
> friend Nurgle
> > > > > > > > performs very
> > > > > > > > > well, get close enough and breathe them to death...
> > > > Just make
> > > > > > > > sure he can't
> > > > > > > > > see too many of your units in the first turn...
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Also, juggers are great for taking out your opponent's
> > > > > > > > > superheavies/praetorians...
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Trygve
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > > > > > > From: Sam Dale [ mailto:epic_at_...
> > > > > > > > > <mailto:epic_at_...> ]
> > > > > > > > > Sent: 23. mai 2001 02:10
> > > > > > > > > To: netepic_at_yahoogroups.com
> > > > <mailto:netepic_at_yahoogroups.com>
> > > > > > > > > Subject: [NetEpic ML] Unbalanced armies?
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Hum. Tonight I was lining up a game or two for
> the next few
> > > > > > > > > weeks, and I've
> > > > > > > > > been refused games if I use Squats or Nids. These
> > > > are veteran
> > > > > > > > players who
> > > > > > > > > won't play against these two armies.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > How do people who regularly go up against
> stumpies and bugs
> > > > > > > > > regularly (with
> > > > > > > > > marines or chaos specifically) fight these two armies.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Cheers,
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Sammy Chaos. Barprop of Slaanesh and Bane of the
> Organised.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > To unsubscribe send e-mail to:
> > > > netepic-unsubscribe_at_egroups.com
> > > > > > > > > <mailto:netepic-unsubscribe_at_egroups.com>
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Your use of Ya!
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > hoo! Groups is subject to
> http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
> > > > > > > > > <http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/>
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > To unsubscribe send e-mail to:
> > > > netepic-unsubscribe_at_egroups.com
> > > > > > > > > <mailto:netepic-unsubscribe_at_egroups.com>
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to
> > > > > > > > http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
> > > > > > > > > <http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/>
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > To unsubscribe send e-mail to:
> > > > netepic-unsubscribe_at_egroups.com
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo!
> > > > Terms of Service
> > > > > > > > > <http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/> .
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Yahoo! Domains Yahoo! Domains
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> <http://us.adserver.yahoo.com/l?M=201903.1443829.3021311.1268964/D
> > > > > > =egroupmai
> > > > > > > > l/S=1700059081:N/A=661891/rand=752607469>
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > To unsubscribe send e-mail to:
> netepic-unsubscribe_at_egroups.com
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo!
> > > > Terms of Service
> > > > > > > > <http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/> .
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > ***********************************************
> > > > > > > > This message confirms that this E-Mail
> > > > > > > > has been scanned for the presence of
> > > > > > > > Computer Virus, and deemed Virus-Free
> > > > > > > > by F-Secure Antivirus
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Mon, 28 May 2001 09:30:31 +0200
> > > > > > > > ***********************************************
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > ***********************************************
> > > > > > > > This message confirms that this E-Mail
> > > > > > > > has been scanned for the presence of
> > > > > > > > Computer Virus, and deemed Virus-Free
> > > > > > > > by F-Secure Antivirus
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Mon, 28 May 2001 09:43:57 +0200
> > > > > > > > ***********************************************
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > To unsubscribe send e-mail to:
> netepic-unsubscribe_at_egroups.com
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to
> > > > > http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > To unsubscribe send e-mail to: netepic-unsubscribe_at_egroups.com
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to
> > > > > http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > To unsubscribe send e-mail to: netepic-unsubscribe_at_egroups.com
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to
> > > > http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > To unsubscribe send e-mail to: netepic-unsubscribe_at_egroups.com
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to
> > > > http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > To unsubscribe send e-mail to: netepic-unsubscribe_at_egroups.com
> > > > >
> > > > > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to
> > > > http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > To unsubscribe send e-mail to: netepic-unsubscribe_at_egroups.com
> > > > >
> > > > > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to
> > > > http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > To unsubscribe send e-mail to: netepic-unsubscribe_at_egroups.com
> > > >
> > > > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to
> > > > http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > ***********************************************
> > > > This message confirms that this E-Mail
> > > > has been scanned for the presence of
> > > > Computer Virus, and deemed Virus-Free
> > > > by F-Secure Antivirus
> > > >
> > > > Mon, 28 May 2001 12:51:22 +0200
> > > > ***********************************************
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > > ***********************************************
> > > This message confirms that this E-Mail
> > > has been scanned for the presence of
> > > Computer Virus, and deemed Virus-Free
> > > by F-Secure Antivirus
> > >
> > > Mon, 28 May 2001 13:12:58 +0200
> > > ***********************************************
> > >
> > > To unsubscribe send e-mail to: netepic-unsubscribe_at_egroups.com
> > >
> > > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
> >
> >
> >
>
>
> To unsubscribe send e-mail to: netepic-unsubscribe_at_egroups.com
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>
>
>
To unsubscribe send e-mail to: netepic-unsubscribe_at_egroups.com
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
Received on Mon May 28 2001 - 12:04:58 UTC