Hi!
They don't follow the titan rules, although as praetorians they could
first fire versus infantry, but they dont have any special electo-hulls
or anything like that.
Peter
Trygve Bj�rnstad wrote:
> The rules say this:
> "Due to their size and slow speed they are vulnerable to close combat by
> lesser units. Close combat with Praetorians is resolved in the normal
> fashion as described under the close combat rules section. The special close
> combat rules for Titans do not apply to Praetorians."
>
> The way I read "do not" is that they actually "do not" follow titan rules,
> but I could of course be wrong... :)
>
> Trygve
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: eivind.borgeteien_at_... [mailto:eivind.borgeteien_at_...]
>> Sent: 28. mai 2001 11:53
>> To: netepic_at_yahoogroups.com
>> Subject: Sv: RE: [NetEpic ML] Unbalanced armies?
>> Sensitivity: Confidential
>>
>>
>> No thats not correct.
>> The templates should be used on all units that have them...
>>
>> Eivind
>>
>>> Fra: nils.saugen_at_...
>>> Dato: 2001/05/28 Mon AM 10:15:02 CEST
>>> Til: netepic_at_yahoogroups.com
>>> Emne: RE: [NetEpic ML] Unbalanced armies?
>>>
>>> Old discussion really, we don't use the templates in CC for other than
>>> Titans. This is probably not correct as by net epic standard.
>>>
>>> Nils
>>>
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: Karlsen Rune [mailto:rune.karlsen_at_...]
>>> Sent: 28. mai 2001 09:44
>>> To: 'netepic_at_yahoogroups.com'
>>> Subject: RE: [NetEpic ML] Unbalanced armies?
>>>
>>>
>>> I dont think we use the damage templates correctly in CC.
>>>
>>> Rune
>>>
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: Trygve Bj�rnstad [mailto:trygve_at_...]
>>> Sent: 28. mai 2001 09:31
>>> To: netepic_at_yahoogroups.com
>>> Subject: RE: [NetEpic ML] Unbalanced armies?
>>>
>>>
>>> It worked fine against the squat colossus the last time I tried :)
>>>
>>> Trygve
>>>
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: Peter Ramos [mailto:primarch_at_...]
>>> Sent: 25. mai 2001 15:33
>>> To: netepic_at_yahoogroups.com
>>> Subject: Re: [NetEpic ML] Unbalanced armies?
>>>
>>>
>>> Hi!
>>>
>>> I remember the jugger tactic was good in the old days, but
>>
>> praetorians have
>>
>>> first fire and a template now so does it still work as well?
>>>
>>> Peter
>>>
>>> Trygve Bj�rnstad wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> I've never faced the nids, but I quite enjoy spanking squats
>>
>> with my chaos
>>
>>> army.
>>>
>>> I tend to field a fast-moving chaos army, moving in on the
>>
>> little guys and
>>
>>> unleashing the chaos powers. Especially my old friend Nurgle
>>
>> performs very
>>
>>> well, get close enough and breathe them to death... Just make
>>
>> sure he can't
>>
>>> see too many of your units in the first turn...
>>>
>>> Also, juggers are great for taking out your opponent's
>>> superheavies/praetorians...
>>>
>>> Trygve
>>>
>>>
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: Sam Dale [ mailto:epic_at_...
>>> <mailto:epic_at_...> ]
>>> Sent: 23. mai 2001 02:10
>>> To: netepic_at_yahoogroups.com <mailto:netepic_at_yahoogroups.com>
>>> Subject: [NetEpic ML] Unbalanced armies?
>>>
>>>
>>> Hum. Tonight I was lining up a game or two for the next few
>>> weeks, and I've
>>> been refused games if I use Squats or Nids. These are veteran
>>
>> players who
>>
>>> won't play against these two armies.
>>>
>>> How do people who regularly go up against stumpies and bugs
>>> regularly (with
>>> marines or chaos specifically) fight these two armies.
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>>
>>> Sammy Chaos. Barprop of Slaanesh and Bane of the Organised.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> To unsubscribe send e-mail to: netepic-unsubscribe_at_egroups.com
>>> <mailto:netepic-unsubscribe_at_egroups.com>
>>>
>>> Your use of Ya!
>>>
>>> hoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>>> <http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> To unsubscribe send e-mail to: netepic-unsubscribe_at_egroups.com
>>> <mailto:netepic-unsubscribe_at_egroups.com>
>>>
>>> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to
>>
>> http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>>
>>> <http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> To unsubscribe send e-mail to: netepic-unsubscribe_at_egroups.com
>>>
>>> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service
>>> <http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/> .
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
>>>
>>>
>>> Yahoo! Domains Yahoo! Domains
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
> <http://us.adserver.yahoo.com/l?M=201903.1443829.3021311.1268964/D=egroupmai
>
>> l/S=1700059081:N/A=661891/rand=752607469>
>>
>> To unsubscribe send e-mail to: netepic-unsubscribe_at_egroups.com
>>
>> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service
>> <http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/> .
>>
>>
>> ***********************************************
>> This message confirms that this E-Mail
>> has been scanned for the presence of
>> Computer Virus, and deemed Virus-Free
>> by F-Secure Antivirus
>>
>> Mon, 28 May 2001 09:30:31 +0200
>> ***********************************************
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> ***********************************************
>> This message confirms that this E-Mail
>> has been scanned for the presence of
>> Computer Virus, and deemed Virus-Free
>> by F-Secure Antivirus
>>
>> Mon, 28 May 2001 09:43:57 +0200
>> ***********************************************
>>
>> To unsubscribe send e-mail to: netepic-unsubscribe_at_egroups.com
>>
>> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>>
>>
>> To unsubscribe send e-mail to: netepic-unsubscribe_at_egroups.com
>>
>> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>
> To unsubscribe send e-mail to: netepic-unsubscribe_at_egroups.com
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>
>
>
>
> To unsubscribe send e-mail to: netepic-unsubscribe_at_egroups.com
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>
>
>
>
Received on Mon May 28 2001 - 13:51:44 UTC