Hi!
First, they are optional, so there is no need to "restrict" them
because they are already restricted by being optional. Squat
praetorians are special cards, so those slots are usually reserved for
them, so making these "special cards" will most certaintly mean they
wont be used. These units are pretty low key, I'd leave them as is,
but I definately make their move 10cm, they are squats, they ARE SLOW.
Besides couple this with transports and you got too much mobility.
Peter
--- In netepic_at_y..., <eivind.borgeteien_at_c...> wrote:
> This unit is no gamewinner it can only take those OPs infantry cant
take, and the squats already have a unit for this purpose, bikes. And
the minute the command vehicle is gone, the unit is quite useless.
>
> I'm not sure if people are going to use the unit if it ends up as a
special card as all the other special cards are much better than this
one.
>
> If we make it a SC we will have to make the card somewhat better.
>
> What does the rest of you say?
>
> Eivind
> >
> > Fra: Karlsen Rune <rune.karlsen_at_e...>
> > Dato: 2001/06/08 Fri AM 11:59:16 CEST
> > Til: "'netepic_at_y...'" <netepic_at_y...>
> > Emne: RE: [NetEpic ML] Optional Squat Unit
> >
> > Yes, that is Nils' and my opinion as well.
> > Make the company a special card if it's going
> > to be implemented.
> >
> > Rune
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Trygve Bj�rnstad [mailto:trygve_at_n...]
> > > Sent: 8. juni 2001 11:34
> > > To: netepic_at_y...
> > > Subject: RE: [NetEpic ML] Optional Squat Unit
> > >
> > >
> > > Should be a special card itself, not a company card!
> > >
> > > Trygve
> > >
> > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > From: Karlsen Rune [mailto:rune.karlsen_at_e...]
> > > > Sent: 8. juni 2001 10:48
> > > > To: 'netepic_at_y...'
> > > > Subject: RE: [NetEpic ML] Optional Squat Unit
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Are we really sure we want to give the squats a cheap
> > > company card? This
> > > > will
> > > > allow them to take even more Colossuses and Leviathans.
> > > >
> > > > Rune
> > > >
> > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > From: Eivind Borgeteien [mailto:eivind.borgeteien_at_c...]
> > > > Sent: 6. juni 2001 22:25
> > > > To: netepic_at_y...
> > > > Subject: [NetEpic ML] Optional Squat Unit
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > As any player (I think) that has been around for a while
> > > and have an IG or
> > > > SM army, I have a whole bunch of robots laying around. With
> > > my ideas on
> > > > using robots in drop pods, and now a unit for the squats, I
hope
> > > > we all can
> > > > dry the dust off theese guys.
> > > >
> > > > This is a unit I made shortly after watching the latest Star
Wars
> > > > movie, and
> > > > with the recent discussions around Squats, and lately
> > > robots/walkers I
> > > > thought this was a proper time to present the unit.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Ironbreaker Armoured Robot Squadron (Company Card)
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > The Ironbreaker Armoured Robot Squadron consist of two robot
> > > > detachments and
> > > > one super heavy command vehicle. The role of the command
> > > vehicle is to
> > > > transports the robot detachments into battle, and then control
> > > > the robots.
> > > >
> > > > As long as the command vehicle is operational, the owning
> > > player can give
> > > > orders to the robots as normal. If the command vehicle should
be
> > > > destroyed,
> > > > the robots will go back to their prewritten programs. The
> > > command vehicle
> > > > has to be within 25 cm of the robotdetachments to be able
> > > to give them
> > > > orders. If the vehicle is further away than this, the robots
will
> > > > go back to
> > > > their prewritten programs.
> > > >
> > > > The command vehicle is considered a commander, so all rules
for
> > > > commanders
> > > > applies to this vehicle
> > > >
> > > > Due to the technical nature of this units, the availability
> > > is somewhat
> > > > scarce. Only one IARS is allowed pr 3000 points.
> > > >
> > > > Models: For the vehicle, use any suitable tank of super
> > > heavy size without
> > > > big guns. For robots, any robotic looking 6 or 10 mm
> > > miniature will do.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Unit Name
> > > >
> > > > Move
> > > >
> > > > Save
> > > >
> > > > CAF
> > > >
> > > > Weapon
> > > >
> > > > Range
> > > >
> > > > Attack Dice
> > > >
> > > > To hit roll
> > > >
> > > > Target's save modifier
> > > >
> > > > Notes
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Robots
> > > >
> > > > 10 cm
> > > >
> > > > 5+
> > > >
> > > > +2
> > > >
> > > > Autocannon
> > > >
> > > > 75 cm
> > > >
> > > > 1
> > > >
> > > > 5+
> > > >
> > > > 0
> > > >
> > > > Walker, special rules.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Command Vehicle
> > > >
> > > > 15 cm
> > > >
> > > > 1+ all round
> > > >
> > > > +3
> > > >
> > > > Heavy Bolters
> > > >
> > > > 25 cm
> > > >
> > > > 4
> > > >
> > > > 5+
> > > >
> > > > 0
> > > >
> > > > Carries 10 robots
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Name
> > > >
> > > > Contents
> > > >
> > > > Break
> > > >
> > > > Point
> > > >
> > > > Morale
> > > >
> > > > Victory
> > > >
> > > > Points
> > > >
> > > > Cost
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Ironbreaker Robot Squadron
> > > >
> > > > 2 robot detachments (5 robots each)
> > > >
> > > > 1 Command Vehicle
> > > >
> > > > 10/CV
> > > >
> > > > -
> > > >
> > > > 2+1
> > > >
> > > > 300
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Would love to get some feedback on this!
> > > >
> > > > Eivind
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
> > > >
> > > >
<
http://rd.yahoo.com/M=206662.1458837.3039162.908943/D=egroupmail/
> > > S=17000590
> > > 81:N/A=682980/*http://altfarm.mediaplex.com/ad/ck/1114-3934-10
> > 39-0?mpt=99185
> > > 8458> Check out great fares at Orbitz!
> > >
> > > <http://us.adserver.yahoo.com/l?M=206662.1458837.3039162.90894
> > 3/D=egroupmail
> > /S=1700059081:N/A=682980/rand=330448846>
> >
> > To unsubscribe send e-mail to: netepic-unsubscribe_at_egroups.com
> >
> > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of
Service
> > <http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/> .
> >
> >
> > ***********************************************
> > This message confirms that this E-Mail
> > has been scanned for the presence of
> > Computer Virus, and deemed Virus-Free
> > by F-Secure Antivirus
> >
> > Wed, 6 Jun 2001 22:25:16 +0200
> > ***********************************************
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > ***********************************************
> > This message confirms that this E-Mail
> > has been scanned for the presence of
> > Computer Virus, and deemed Virus-Free
> > by F-Secure Antivirus
> >
> > Fri, 8 Jun 2001 10:48:21 +0200
> > ***********************************************
> >
> > To unsubscribe send e-mail to: netepic-unsubscribe_at_egroups.com
> >
> > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > To unsubscribe send e-mail to: netepic-unsubscribe_at_egroups.com
> >
> > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
> >
> >
> >
> > *
> > **********************************************
> > This message confirms that this E-Mail
> > has been scanned for the presence of
> > Computer Virus, and deemed Virus-Free
> > by F-Secure Antivirus
> >
> > Fri, 8 Jun 2001 11:33:31 +0200
> > ***********************************************
> >
> >
> > ***********************************************
> > This message confirms that this E-Mail
> > has been scanned for the presence of
> > Computer Virus, and deemed Virus-Free
> > by F-Secure Antivirus
> >
> > Fri, 8 Jun 2001 11:59:16 +0200
> > ***********************************************
> >
> > To unsubscribe send e-mail to: netepic-unsubscribe_at_egroups.com
> >
> > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
> >
> >
> >
Received on Fri Jun 08 2001 - 13:11:21 UTC