RE: [NetEpic ML] Re: Dark Angels

From: Tom Webb <mail_at_...>
Date: Fri, 8 Jun 2001 16:28:15 +0100

Additional company, nice for the larger games. I always thought that the
codex policy of only have one of each Assault, Tactical and Devestator
company and then four battle companies was a bit limiting for the larger
battles.

The first company I always took was a tactical company. Imagine if the
chapter was involved in a pair of battles, one of us would have the tactical
company and the other would have to make do. Unless the 1st company took on
a veteran tactical role.

Tom.

-----Original Message-----
From: primarch_at_... [mailto:primarch@...]
Sent: 08 June 2001 15:09
To: netepic_at_yahoogroups.com
Subject: [NetEpic ML] Re: Dark Angels


Hi!

Hmmm... I'm not at home now so I can't check, but I remember some
article that gave Chapter composition, probably a first edition WD
article, I'll check this later, but I remember that ravenwing was an
"additional" company or perhaps substituted the scouts.

Peter


--- In netepic_at_y..., "Tom Webb" <mail_at_t...> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I was just wondering, what is the companies structure for the
Dark Angels?
>
> I have bought enough minatures to paint up the Dark Angel
chapter in my new
> NetEpic marine army, but am not sure as to the exact structure.
>
> I have the standard Codex lists for companies and there
numbers, but with
> the Raven Wing I am assuming that one of the battle companies is
replaced
> with it.
>
> The main reason I am asking is that I am painting the banners
and
> incorporating the company number onto the banners.
>
> Tom.


To unsubscribe send e-mail to: netepic-unsubscribe_at_egroups.com

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
Received on Fri Jun 08 2001 - 15:28:15 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Tue Oct 22 2019 - 10:59:23 UTC