> My thoughts below...
> >
> > Fra: nils.saugen_at_...
> > Dato: 2001/06/12 Tue AM 11:49:49 CEST
> > Til: netepic_at_yahoogroups.com
> > Emne: RE: [NetEpic ML] On the new squat units
> >
> > I think we can use the hellfury as it is, only makeing it a
> Robot carrying
> > APC instead. Removeing it's possibility to carry any other
> units????
>
> ---> No, lets rather percieve it as a rebuilded Hellfury
>
> Adding
> > the override program to it.
> >
> > This would mean that a detachment consisting of 5 robots
> (any of the 4 or 5
> > types) + one hellfury APC would cost 250 points. The
> company would cost 750
> > points. I think this is a good one.
>
> ---> Sounds OK but I will look into it
>
> > The Hellfury can override the robot program for 1
> detachment of robots
> > within 25 cm of the tank, giving them orders as normal. If
> the hellfury is
> > destroyed, the Robots may not do anything for the remainder
> of that turn,
> > except defend in cc. The next turn the go back to their
> original program.
>
> ---> One turn in epic aproximately 30-45 minutes (game time
> not realtime)Theres no way a computer uses this long to reboot!
Oh, yes, did we forget to mention they're running on a 8MHz 286
using a modified version of Win 3.1?
;)
Rune
> Eivind
> > Nils
> >
> >
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: eivind.borgeteien_at_...
> [mailto:eivind.borgeteien_at_...]
> > Sent: 12. juni 2001 11:13
> > To: netepic_at_yahoogroups.com
> > Subject: [NetEpic ML] On the new squat units
> > Sensitivity: Confidential
> >
> >
> > One of the main grudges people have against the squats is
> that they are hard
> > to break. The Shortbeards are much easier to break and
> should provide some
> > easier VPs for the oponent. This way it should be very well
> balanced.
> >
> > The Slayer Cult is taken from WFB and I think it would have
> been introduced
> > sooner or later if GW has continued their squat range for
> epic. At least
> > thats my personal POV...
> >
> > It WAS introduced as a joke, but then as a Companycard with
> 3 detatchments,
> > with +6, +7 or something in CAF. As a specialcard of one
> detatchment with
> > far reduced CAF, I think this units deserves some testing.
> >
> > Isnt it food for thought that the only ones crying "wolf!"
> here are the ones
> > that always have beaten the Squats.....? :-)
> >
> > There are at present time no stats for the APC carrying the
> robots. I havent
> > gotten around to do that yet, but you might want to take a
> look at the
> > Hellfury APC
> >
> > Eivind
> >
> >
> >
> > To unsubscribe send e-mail to: netepic-unsubscribe_at_egroups.com
> >
> > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to
> http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
> >
> >
> > To unsubscribe send e-mail to: netepic-unsubscribe_at_egroups.com
> >
> > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to
> http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>
> To unsubscribe send e-mail to: netepic-unsubscribe_at_egroups.com
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to
> http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>
>
>
>
> ***********************************************
> This message confirms that this E-Mail
> has been scanned for the presence of
> Computer Virus, and deemed Virus-Free
> by F-Secure Antivirus
>
> Tue, 12 Jun 2001 13:28:14 +0200
> ***********************************************
>
***********************************************
This message confirms that this E-Mail
has been scanned for the presence of
Computer Virus, and deemed Virus-Free
by F-Secure Antivirus
Tue, 12 Jun 2001 13:35:23 +0200
***********************************************
Received on Tue Jun 12 2001 - 11:35:23 UTC