My main concern with introducing these suggested units is that we're
basically trying to give all armies a little bit of everything. This will
only result in all armies being identical apart from the fluff. Is that what
we want?
Trygve
> -----Original Message-----
> From: eivind.borgeteien_at_... [mailto:eivind.borgeteien@...]
> Sent: 12. juni 2001 11:13
> To: netepic_at_yahoogroups.com
> Subject: [NetEpic ML] On the new squat units
> Sensitivity: Confidential
>
>
> One of the main grudges people have against the squats is that
> they are hard to break. The Shortbeards are much easier to break
> and should provide some easier VPs for the oponent. This way it
> should be very well balanced.
>
> The Slayer Cult is taken from WFB and I think it would have been
> introduced sooner or later if GW has continued their squat range
> for epic. At least thats my personal POV...
>
> It WAS introduced as a joke, but then as a Companycard with 3
> detatchments, with +6, +7 or something in CAF. As a specialcard
> of one detatchment with far reduced CAF, I think this units
> deserves some testing.
>
> Isnt it food for thought that the only ones crying "wolf!" here
> are the ones that always have beaten the Squats.....? :-)
>
> There are at present time no stats for the APC carrying the
> robots. I havent gotten around to do that yet, but you might want
> to take a look at the Hellfury APC
>
> Eivind
>
>
>
> To unsubscribe send e-mail to: netepic-unsubscribe_at_egroups.com
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>
>
>
Received on Tue Jun 12 2001 - 11:56:36 UTC