Hi!
Ahem, this is where I repeat my old beaten mantra, "any units created
from the conclusion of the revision of net epic (now version
4.1)onwards are considered optional and should be sent to Tom for
inclusion in Incoming!
Repeat- OPTIONAL. No unit will EVER become mainstream without the
usual vote and extensive playtesting.
The presentation of of optional units should be considered a adding to
the variety of selection. One must remeber that this list is all a lot
of people have as far as new ideas and new units for thier armies.
Therefore it is good to add things in an optional manner.
We all know that hardly anyone on this list plays net epic as is and
there are many house rules and such. Just view these add-ons as
totally optional, thus requiring consent of the gaming group
involved. One man's "cheese" is another man's snack.
I agree that one should NOT fill in the gaps of weakness a army list
has as far as core units go, but one is curious to field "special"
units and optional ones permit players to tailor the game without
ramming an aura of officialty down a gaming groups throat.
So let your creative urges loose ,its okay, it gives Incoming! mch
needed material, it gives us something to discuss, play with and test
and the great thing is if you don't like it, just forget it-it's
OPTIONAL!
Peter
--- In netepic_at_y..., "P.J.T" <paul.j.t_at_b...> wrote:
>
>
> > My main concern with introducing these suggested units is that
we're
> > basically trying to give all armies a little bit of everything.
This will
> > only result in all armies being identical apart from the fluff. Is
that
> what
> > we want?
> >
> > Trygve
>
> *Disengage cloaking device..*
>
> Sounds like Epic 40K to me.........bad move.......
>
> *engage cloak*
>
> Paul "TuffSkull" T.
> http://tuffnett.com - TuffNett Productions Ltd.
> http://epic40k.com - If its Epic, Its there!
> http://welcome.to/weird_world - Weird World Wargaming.
Received on Tue Jun 12 2001 - 12:38:17 UTC