IMO 100 points is too much. A Spirit Host, for example, is a whopping 25
points cheaper than a wraithguard detachment, 2 dreadnought detachments and
a warlock bought separately. A Falcon host doesn't have a commander yet it's
not any cheaper than buying 3 separate detachments. A Grand Battery gets a
50 point discount, so that's what I would be willing to give to the robot
company; 700 points would be appropriate.
Jyrki Saari
-There is no such thing as free lunch because eating takes time and time is
money.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: ext [mailto:eivind.borgeteien_at_...]
> Sent: 14. June 2001 9:49
> To: netepic_at_yahoogroups.com
> Subject: Sv: RE: [NetEpic ML] Squat Robots
> Sensitivity: Confidential
>
>
> Thats correct, but some companies dont have commanders,
> theese units get also price reduction.
>
> In the case of the robot company, this reuction would be the
> price of a commander, which in this case is a command
> vehicle. This would be a reduction of 150 points, but I
> thought this would make the company too cheap, so I settled
> for a reduction of 100 points.
>
> Eivind
> >
> > Fra: Karlsen Rune <rune.karlsen_at_...>
> > Dato: 2001/06/14 Thu AM 08:39:16 CEST
> > Til: "'netepic_at_yahoogroups.com'" <netepic_at_yahoogroups.com>
> > Emne: RE: [NetEpic ML] Squat Robots
> >
> > Really? I thought it was just customary to include
> commanders for free?
> > So, you get the commanders for free AND a reduced price?
> Hey, i wanna
> > redo the Slann rules! ;)
> >
> > Rune
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Eivind Borgeteien [mailto:eivind.borgeteien_at_...]
> > Sent: 13. juni 2001 17:17
> > To: netepic_at_yahoogroups.com
> > Subject: Re: [NetEpic ML] Squat Robots
> >
> >
> > Hi!
> > I see theres no feedback on the squat Robots. I take it
> that hey are OK the
> > way they are now. I want to change one thing though, the
> price on the
> > company should go down somewhat.
> >
> > It is custumary in epic that a compay is cheaper than bying
> the detachments
> > seperately, so the new cost is 650, VP 8
> >
> > Eivind
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: Eivind Borgeteien <mailto:eivind.borgeteien_at_...>
> > To: netepic_at_yahoogroups.com <mailto:netepic_at_yahoogroups.com>
> > Sent: Tuesday, June 12, 2001 9:02P M
> > Subject: [NetEpic ML] Squat Robots
> >
> > Hi!
> > Here are the new and revised robot unit!
> >
> > A note on the breakpoint: All robot detachments have 100%
> BP so thats why
> > the BP on this unit is high, but that just fits in with the
> rest os the
> > squat units.
> >
> > Is this OK?
> >
> > Eivind
> >
> >
> >
> > ARMOURED ROBOT SQUADRON
> >
> >
> > The greater availability of robots has led to even more
> development of the
> > robotic weaponsystems. The Armoured Robot Squadron consist
> of 5 robots and
> > one super heavy command vehicle. The role of the command
> vehicle is to
> > transports the robots into battle, and then control the robots.
> >
> > As long as the command vehicle is operational, the owning
> player can give
> > orders to the robots as normal. If the command vehicle
> should be destroyed,
> > the robots will go back to their prewritten programs. The
> command vehicle
> > has to be within 25 cm of the robots to be able to give
> them orders. If the
> > vehicle is further away than this, the robots will go back to their
> > prewritten programs.
> >
> > The command vehicle is considered a commander, so all
> rules for commanders
> > applies to this vehicle
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Unit Name
> >
> > Move
> >
> > Save
> >
> > CAF
> >
> > Weapon
> >
> > Range
> >
> > Attack Dice
> >
> > To hit roll
> >
> > Target's save modifier
> >
> > Notes
> >
> >
> > Robots
> >
> > 10 cm
> >
> > 5+
> >
> > +2
> >
> > Autocannon
> >
> > 75 cm
> >
> > 1
> >
> > 5+
> >
> > 0
> >
> > Walker, special rules.
> >
> >
> > Hellfury Command Vehicle
> >
> > 15 cm
> >
> > 1+ all round
> >
> > +3
> >
> > Autocannon
> >
> > Heavy Bolters
> >
> > 50 cm
> >
> > 25 cm
> >
> > 2
> >
> > 4
> >
> > 5+
> >
> > 5+
> >
> > -1
> >
> > 0
> >
> > Carries 5 robots
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Name
> >
> > Contents
> >
> > Break
> >
> > Point
> >
> > Morale
> >
> > Victory
> >
> > Points
> >
> > Cost
> >
> >
> > Armoured Robot Squadron
> >
> > (Support Card)
> >
> > 5 robots
> >
> > 1 Command Vehicle
> >
> > 5
> >
> > -
> >
> > 3
> >
> > 250
> >
> >
> > Armoured Robot Company
> >
> > (Company Card)
> >
> > 3 Commad Vehicles, 3 Robot detatchments
> >
> > 15
> >
> > -
> >
> > 9
> >
> > 750
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > "Smile, the computer doesn�t REALLY hate you, it�s just
> having FUN!!!"
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > To unsubscribe send e-mail to: netepic-unsubscribe_at_egroups.com
> >
> > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service
> > <http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/> .
> >
> >
> >
> > Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
> >
> >
> <http://rd.yahoo.com/M=190462.1393721.2979173.2/D=egroupmail/S
=1700059081:N/
> A=551014/?http://www.debticated.com> www.debticated.com
>
>
<
http://us.adserver.yahoo.com/l?M=190462.1393721.2979173.2/D=egroupmail/S=17
> 00059081:N/A=551014/rand=336180246>
>
> To unsubscribe send e-mail to: netepic-unsubscribe_at_egroups.com
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service
> <http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/> .
>
>
> ***********************************************
> This message confirms that this E-Mail
> has been scanned for the presence of
> Computer Virus, and deemed Virus-Free
> by F-Secure Antivirus
>
> Wed, 13 Jun 2001 17:16:41 +0200
> ***********************************************
>
>
>
>
> ***********************************************
> This message confirms that this E-Mail
> has been scanned for the presence of
> Computer Virus, and deemed Virus-Free
> by F-Secure Antivirus
>
> Thu, 14 Jun 2001 08:39:16 +0200
> ***********************************************
>
> To unsubscribe send e-mail to: netepic-unsubscribe_at_egroups.com
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>
>
>
To unsubscribe send e-mail to: netepic-unsubscribe_at_egroups.com
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
Received on Thu Jun 14 2001 - 07:35:23 UTC