Re: [Epic] Epic 41K Rule changes

From: J. Michael Looney <mlooney_at_...>
Date: Fri, 10 Oct 1997 04:17:44 -0500

Eugene Earnshaw-Whyte wrote:
> > Things that I am thinking about for fliers in general:
> > 1) allow them 1 turn of up to 90 degrees, at some point in there flight
> > path. This will help a lot with avoiding snap fire.
> > 2) Restrict snap fire vs. flyers to FLAK units and HEAVY WEAPON units,
> > with FLAK units having a "normal" range and HEAVY WEAPON units having a
> > 10 cm range.
>
> I think either of these options would do fine; I'm not sure which I prefer (perhaps I'll
> have to try them out! )
>
That was a both, not a one or the other.

> Incidentally, would you think that, in the interests of convenience, Flyers that are
> driven off become immune to further fire, or whether they should, instead, still have to
> cross the rest of the map, perhaps allowing the opposition further chances to shoot them
> down?
>
I had assumed that this was the case all ready.


-- 
Sillyness is the last refuse of the doomed.  P. Opus
--
Geek code: GAT d-- s:-- a C+++ UL++ P+ L++ !E- W+++ N++ o K++ w+++ !o
!M-- !V-- PS+ PE++ Y+ PGP t++ 5+ X R+++ tv+ b++++ DI++++ D G++ e+
h---(*)
r+++ y+++(**)
http://www.spellbooksoftware.com
Received on Fri Oct 10 1997 - 09:17:44 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Tue Oct 22 2019 - 13:09:57 UTC