Mark A Shieh <SHODAN+_at_...> came forth and spoke thusly:
> IMHO, a better solution would be to give the LR 2FP instead of
>2 AT shots, just like the Falcon has. They were about equivalent in
>SM/TL, though 3FP wouldn't be unreasonable, since it was better at
>shooting things on open ground than the Falcon, and shot as well as
>two of my Dreadnaughts. It fixes the LR problem, and the other armies
>can stop complaining about the dreaded Land Raider without proposing
>an escalation of power. (Hey, I do it too!). I mean, if the more
>accurate, same strength Lascannon on the Falcon doesn't qualify for
>AT, why should the Land Raider?
Let's play Count the Lascannons, children! Falcon? 1 (2 if you count the
Scatter Laser which might be able to be upgraded). Land Raider? 4. Some
difference here, methinks.
--
Colen 'Not Colin' 'Mad Dog' McAlister, Director of N.A.S.A.
(the National Anti-Skaven Alliance) and R'n'F Member.
Find me at http://www.bryanmac.demon.co.uk/colen or by e-mail
at colen_at_.... NASA lives at nasa_at_b.d.c.u.
Received on Wed Nov 05 1997 - 21:55:53 UTC