Re: [Epic] Epic 40K (!_at_#@!*#&)

From: koen devroey <KOEN.DEVROEY_at_...>
Date: Sat, 8 Feb 1997 11:46:23 +0100 ()

On Thu, 6 Feb 1997, Jeff wrote:

> >Might have to innocently ask what he knows. As much as I hate a guy that
> >thinks the epic rules are pathetic and the 40K are great, maybe we can glean
> >info from him. 40K = Great & epic = crap? What planet did this guy come from?
> >
> Personally, as an avid 40k player, I believe that this new "Epic in 40k"
> (sounds like something from a Science for the Future film from the '50s)
> will suck. I mean, 40k, as it is now, won't feel right for such a large
> scale. Besides, 40k is fun as is when using huge armies. I'd rather have
> the Epic rules (minus the cheese) as they are now than using watered down
> 40k rules. From what I've heard, all's I can say is that I'm glad I didn't
> go out and buy a lot of Knight models. Also, I'd rather see GW flesh out
> the squats for 40k and flesh out other things before reinventing a game
> which is fine as is. Oh well....

Absolutely! Exactly what I'm thinking about it (I also play epic and 40k)
> "Keep that money rolling- ROLLING! ROLLING! ROLLING! -Keep that money
> rolling- EPIC!!"
> a.k.a. Gorblitz Arpdakka
> "Bane of the Panzee"
Received on Thu Jan 01 1970 - 00:00:00 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Tue Oct 22 2019 - 13:09:06 UTC