Re: [Epic] Cheddar & Edam (Mon erreur)

From: Simon Larouche <larouche_at_...>
Date: Thu, 29 Jan 1998 14:12:33 -0500

Oui je voulais dire SM pour Space Marine :) hehe merci !

Simon Larouche



-----Original Message-----
From: Francois Bruntz <fbruntz_at_...>
To: space-marine_at_... <space-marine@...>
Date: Thursday, January 29, 1998 4:34 AM
Subject: Re: [Epic] Cheddar & Edam


>Tu as �crit :
>
>>Well since we are this subject...
>>
>> Do you think using both IG and SP in the same army is cheesy ?
>>
>>I dont think using ONE detachment of SP (250 pts) in a 1500 pts IG army
>is
>>very cheesy ?!?!?
>>
>>Simon LArouche
>>larouche_at_...
>>
>
>I assume that SP means Space Marines.
>In Epic Space Marine/Titan Legions, mixing IG and SM is really cheesy as
>the two armies excel in two different strategies : roughly SM are very
>good in fast assaults and IG has a very good fire power (strong
>artillery) but each army could be fielded independantly without any
>restriction.
>In Epic 40k, this is not true. You can field an IG only army (or a SM
>one) but the two armies are complementary : for example, the SM don't
>have any artillery (save the Whirlinds) and no flak unit (which is a
>very important lack). I think that the Imperial army list encourages
>players to mix the two forces.
>
>
>Fran�ois Bruntz
>Apprenti MIAGE (Universite Paris XII - IBM France)
>
>-------------------------------------------------------
> Lord's Home Page
> Space Marine and Epic 40k
> Last Update : 01/29/97
>
> http://www.geocities.com/TimesSquare/Dungeon/2370/
>-------------------------------------------------------
>
>
>______________________________________________________
>Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com
Received on Thu Jan 29 1998 - 19:12:33 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Tue Oct 22 2019 - 13:10:15 UTC