Re: [Epic] RGMW Newsgroup.

From: Brett Hollindale <agro_at_...>
Date: Fri, 27 Feb 1998 07:59:37 +0100 (MET)

At 08:03 PM 25/2/98 -0700, you wrote:
>Dirk Vormann wrote:
>>
>> > This draws the Dominatrix forward, trying to get a line of sight on
>> > something relatively valuable (I usually take only a reaver battlegroup
>> > in large games, or a single reaver in small point games. These are bait
>> > for Biotitans and Doms. Warlords have almost never done anything for me
>> > against tyrannids, except give them a TON of pooint upon their death.
>> > Lords Of battle also work, and sometimes better).
>>
>> Chaos battlegroups? Are you saying you never lost against tyranids because
>> of the house rules you were using?
>>
>> DV
>>
>> brain*beauty=constant
>
>Don't be a jerk. I'm saying I never lost to tyrannids with chaos because
>I cheated at every opportunity, including threats of violence. As far as
>I know, EVERY SM/TL group I know of let Chaos take battlegroups.
>
>Thane


Well, not this group...

We figure that the extra effective titan weapons make up forthe lack of a
battlegroup somewhat.

The battlegroup still looks more appealing, but at least the chaos weapons
make a difference.

We DID use Warlords/Banelords cost 750pys instead of 900, but even so chaos
warhounds were always more in evidence than any other titan...

Agro
Received on Fri Feb 27 1998 - 06:59:37 UTC