[snip]
> > > So basically, each unit would have 2 CAFs?
> I've always prefered this. Some of the super heavy tanks have high CAF
> which comes partly from loads of bolters. These same bolters could not
> hurt another SH at 1cm so why include them in CAF when engaged with an
> armored target.
I totally agree.
> I'm also bothered by the image of two+ vehicles engaged in CC or for that
> matter pinning each other, but thats a different subject altogeather.
I think this is one thing that was handled pretty good in the 1st ed: There
was no vehicle vs vehicle CC. Period. The only way vehicles could get "up close
and personal" was to ram each other.
> Tracy
> >
>
>
Jyrki Saari
js54904_at_...
Received on Thu Feb 20 1997 - 10:32:56 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0
: Tue Oct 22 2019 - 13:09:09 UTC