RE: [Epic] [EPIC] GW Question

From: Steve Wik <bosco_at_...>
Date: Mon, 27 Apr 1998 15:59:37 -0700

No one seems to be bothering NetEpic, but perhaps they get around it by
painstakingly rewording the rules rather than OCRing them directly out
of the original books? (and maybe the overwhelmingly "user-made"
element comes into play also)

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Darren Murray [SMTP:solarus_at_...]
> Sent: Monday, April 27, 1998 3:41 PM
> To: space-marine_at_...
> Subject: [Epic] [EPIC] GW Question
>
> Does anyone know what GW's official policy is of posting rules
> to the net? I was thinking about htmlizing the first edition SM/AT
> rules along with the relevant articles from WD. However, I
> don't want to do that if its going to be a waste of time if I'm asked
> to remove it. Anyone know? Thanks.
>
> Darren Murray
> solarus_at_...
Received on Mon Apr 27 1998 - 22:59:37 UTC