RE: [Epic] Just having fun now! Titan Legion rules vs. Epic 40k

From: Jonathan Westmoreland <JonW_at_...>
Date: Fri, 8 May 1998 09:43:20 -0600

> I love the fluff, but I agree that it should not be in the rules
> section. E40K could have benefited new players better by providing a
> section on the how & why the various races organize their armies.
> Then
> you could probably see armies constructed that have more character &
> are
> more enjoyable to play.
>
> --Elaine
> "Sing, O Goddess, of the bitter wrath of Achilles ...."
>
*switch lurk mode to rant mode*

*Nod of agreement*. My question is, why doesn't the Battles book
have more fluff for the armies? Don't get me wrong here, I do like
what's in that book, but IMHO its the perfect spot for fluff for the
armies. What little fluff that does appear in the book is far too
short, even for new players. And, an opinion as to the reference
to the 40k books for fluff. I play 40k, but if I didn't, why would I
pay
$35 (Canadian) for a Codex for each army I play in Epic? I'm lucky
in the fact that I own the Codexes for my Epic armies, since I play
them in 40k as well. But if I didn't...........that's a lot of money.

*switches rant mode back to lurk mode*

Jonathan Westmoreland
All you know is now in question, for your eyes are now open to the Truth
that is Chaos.
Received on Fri May 08 1998 - 15:43:20 UTC