Re: [Epic] What is acceptable.

From: mlooney - IOnet <mlooney_at_...>
Date: Tue, 26 May 1998 17:47:48 -0500

Scott Shupe wrote:
>
> Mike Looney - ionet wrote:
> >
> > <rant>
> > Gee, can we PLEASE go back to flame wars about targeting rules and army
> > morale?
> >
> > I post 2 LONG things that are 100% on topic, and I don't see even one
> > (1) "that's nice, but don't you think 300+ points for a demon is a bit
> > high" sort of thing.
>
> Well, I was going to say something like that but you
> put a disclaimer about the daemon point costs in your intro so
> I let it be.
>
> But you know, that's a hell of a lot for a unit that's
> easily picked off by AT shots. Might as well not have them in
> there. Double or triple point costs would make more sense to
> me.
>

I think I will go with triple the cost of the major demons and my
calculated cost or the book cost on the others, whichever one is
higher. They will be on the web page in the morning.
Received on Tue May 26 1998 - 22:47:48 UTC