Re: [Epic] Titans and CC (a new theory...)

From: Michael the Liu <mikethel_at_...>
Date: Mon, 3 Mar 1997 16:37:38 -0600 (CST)

>Well Mike, I know what you mean about GW's cruddy rules writing
>capabilities, but...
>
>This stuff comes from TL - the product designed to sell more titans - and it
>is fairly obvious that they are trying to address one of the "problems" with
>titans (that makes the so unappealing, hence inprofitable...)
>
>I would suggest that the intention of the section on titans and gargants in
>CC is to make them less vulnerable to CC, and why mention the bit about
>being able to sweep the base at all? (unless they did remember about
>"pinning"...)
>
>Remember the "fluff" about titans being giants of the EPIC battle field and
>having nothing nothing to worry about except other titans? (I would add
>jump troops top the list of things to worry about, but with the changes to
>the pinning rules on skimmers and the (potential) change to the way you CC a
>titan, it would be almost true...)
>
>Still "undecided"?

If that's what they intended, how come they didn't spell it out any clearer?
I mean, if the troops are pinned by the base, they're in CC, but in order to
reach CC they must reach the feet. What the heck is that supposed to mean!?
So what does happen to the pinned but not in CC troops anyways, nothing is
there to support that they fight but just without multiple attacker bonuses,
they're just stuck in a sort of limbo. If you can find any explanations for
this please feel free to prove me wrong, I would just be too delighted. :)

>Agro

Michael the Liu
Received on Mon Mar 03 1997 - 22:37:38 UTC