Re: [Epic] RE: [Epic] Re:

From: J Andrew Evans <J_Andrew_Evans_at_...>
Date: Tue, 8 Sep 1998 14:35:24 -0400

Message text written by INTERNET:space-marine_at_...
>Now, here is an interesting rules lawyer loophole. Even if the results of
a weapon's fire are interpreted as having the effect of the fire of more
than one of a Super Heavy Weapons type, it is still not a SHW because it is
not specifically listed on the SHW pages.<

Good point. Are we really going to be this beardy??

This rule about 1 BM per weapon (1 pulsar) as opposed to each effect (x
times AT, for example) either applies to everything or to nothing - and
Jervis needs to be picked up on his logic.

A#
Received on Tue Sep 08 1998 - 18:35:24 UTC