Re: [Epic] Q&A 2 (and notes)

From: <duckrvr_at_...>
Date: Wed, 28 May 1997 13:18:48 -0500

At 05:31 PM 5/27/97 +0100, you wrote:
>> >Roll a 4+(2+) to hit the flyer. This will
>> >abort the mission if a hit is scored.
>>
>> All snap fire hits the same, not as a SHW, so I think it would hit at (armor
>> value)+, and kill with the same rule. However, Fire Prisms have AT and
>> flak, and I agree that they would hit on 4+ and then kill on 4+.
>>
>> Temp
>
>Okay, I'll bite. Why do you say this? Quote a rule that supports you.
>I've justified my position - the rules on page 32 and 33 regarding how
>these particular SHWs treat the target's armour.

I don't have a rulebook handy, but IIRC the snap-fire rules make no
distinction based on fp, or even whether or not you are firing a SHW. You
just roll one die against the opponent's armor value. I'll try to remember
to look a page number up tonight.

Temp
Received on Wed May 28 1997 - 18:18:48 UTC