Yes, but then ppl will not choose the battery at all, for it will cost to
much, or they will cry bout not being able to choose what ones they want.
Look when faced against someone that plays this way, just tell him no, or
find away to play against them.
-----Original Message-----
From: Peter Ramos <pramos1_at_...>
To: netepic_at_egroups.com <netepic_at_egroups.com>
Date: Thursday, April 01, 1999 2:12 AM
Subject: [NetEpic ML] Re: one more time
>Hi!
>
>The problem with this is that why would you buy this battery if just by
>launching the missiles you already broke the detachment and lost 3 Vp's?
Now if
>you say that "shotdown" missiles should count towards the breaking point
then I
>agree because you have to earn them, otherwise no.
>
>I think perhaps than raise the soct or make fiddly rules for availability
why
>not just restrict warp missiles to one per battery? Its easier and
eliminates
>the abuse.
>
>Peter
>
>Michele Heidal wrote:
>
>> I think they should count for VPs after you fire them, for they leave the
>> table, this would explain the low cost of them. This way you just add a
rule
>> not change the whole missile set up, less work for all.
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Peter Ramos <pramos1_at_...>
>> To: netepic_at_egroups.com <netepic_at_egroups.com>
>> Date: Wednesday, March 31, 1999 4:31 AM
>> Subject: [NetEpic ML] Re: one more time
>>
>> >Hi!
>> >
>> >Daniel Wiebell wrote:
>> >
>> >> Hi
>> >>
>> >> I agree that a dice roll for availability for Deathstrikes is a VERY
bad
>> >> idea. I think a better solution is to increase their points value. If
a
>> >> titan warp missile is 100, then I think a Deathstrike battery of three
>> >> should be 350 at least, probably more. This is because they don't need
>> >> line of sight to shoot so it makes them a lot more dangerous than the
>> >> titan version.
>> >>
>> >
>> >Point taken this is a better solution.
>> >
>> >> By the way did anyone answer the question of whether used (not
>> >> destroyed) Deathstrikes count for VPs?
>> >
>> >The missiles themselves DO NOT count towards the break point, but the
>> >launchers do.
>> >
>> >Peter
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> >eGroups Spotlight:
>> >"Kosovo-Reports" - Direct reports from Kosovo/Serbia/Yugoslavia.
>> >http://offers.egroups.com/click/252/0
>> >
>> >eGroup home: http://www.eGroups.com/list/netepic
>> >Free Web-based e-mail groups by eGroups.com
>> >
>> >
>> >
>>
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> eGroups Spotlight:
>> "Kosovo-Reports" - Direct reports from Kosovo/Serbia/Yugoslavia.
>> http://offers.egroups.com/click/252/0
>>
>> eGroup home: http://www.eGroups.com/list/netepic
>> Free Web-based e-mail groups by eGroups.com
>
>
>
>
>------------------------------------------------------------------------
>eGroups Spotlight:
>"Kosovo-Reports" - Direct reports from Kosovo/Serbia/Yugoslavia.
>http://offers.egroups.com/click/252/0
>
>eGroup home: http://www.eGroups.com/list/netepic
>Free Web-based e-mail groups by eGroups.com
>
>
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------
eGroup home:
http://www.eGroups.com/list/netepic
Free Web-based e-mail groups by eGroups.com
Received on Wed Mar 31 1999 - 21:06:30 UTC