Guildmaster Mechanic?
-----Original Message-----
From: Flo LeBlanc [mailto:leblanc_at_...]
Sent: Wednesday, November 10, 1999 5:26 PM
To: netepic_at_egroups.com
Subject: [NetEpic ML] Re: sqaut mechpriest
Perhaps we should call him "Squat-at-Arms" *ggg*
----- Original Message -----
From: Peter Ramos
To: netepic_at_egroups.com
Sent: Wednesday, November 10, 1999 8:17 PM
Subject: [NetEpic ML] Re: sqaut mechpriest
Hi!
I agree with your point of view. Its title should be techmaster of
something like that, but not be of religious bent, since squats are not
religiously inclined like the Imperium is.
If someone has a better name let me know so as to change it.
Peter
Axel Michelsen wrote:
Hi
I reread my squat armylist the other day, and I found
that they have a unit called something like
mechpriest.
I like the unit, but is it not wrong to name a squat
unit something like a priest.
According to my Orc and Squat warlords squats are
natural with machines, and they have a high technology
level.
these things taken into account I think that the sqaut
unit should be renamed, because it makes the squats
look like religous fanatics, which they are not, just
like the imperium.
- Axel
=====
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Bid and sell for free at
http://auctions.yahoo.com
----------------------------------------------------------------------
--
Imagine a credit card with a 0% Intro APR and Instant Approval�
It seems impossible, but it�s not. Visit GetSmart.com�s Credit Card
Finder and click on instant approval cards right now at
http://clickhere.egroups.com/click/1272
-- Create a poll/survey for your eGroup!
-- http://www.egroups.com/vote?listname=netepic&m=1
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Click here!
eGroups.com Home: http://www.egroups.com/group/netepic
www.egroups.com - Simplifying group communications
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
--
Click here!
eGroups.com Home: http://www.egroups.com/group/netepic
www.egroups.com - Simplifying group communications
Received on Thu Nov 11 1999 - 02:01:04 UTC