[NetEpic ML] Re: questions

From: Peter Ramos <pramos_at_...>
Date: Thu, 11 Nov 1999 08:29:43 +0000

Hi!

I typed to quick make that SHOULD NOT BE light artiller6y.

Peter

Peter Ramos wrote:

> Hi!
>
> stefano andreoni wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > I have two new questions for the list, I hope not to be too boring for my
> > frequents request.
> >
> > 1) The snap fire paragraph state that artillery units can't snape fire;
> > tarantulas are light artillery (as stated in the army list), so following
> > this rule they could not snap fire, but reading their rules I find that they
> > can, also without the -1 penality.
> > What do you think about this contradiction?
> > The ruler intention was to forbid snape fire only to barrage capable units?
>
> Loophole, tarantula should be light artillery. It may snap fire as any direct
> fire weapon. Only barrage units can't snap fire.
>
> > 2) If only single artillery piece from a detachment (i.e. whirlwind) has a
> > sight to a target, can it qualify the rest of the detachment for direct fire
> > adding each barrage points?
>
> That is correct, it is assumed that the one with line of sight transmits
> coordinates to the others in its detachment.
>
> Peter
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> A shopper´┐Żs dream come true! Find practically anything on earth at eBay!
> Come and browse the more than 2 million items up for bid at any time.
> You never know what you might find at eBay!
> http://clickhere.egroups.com/click/1140
>
> -- eGroup Home: http://www.egroups.com/group/netepic/?m=1
> -- Free email groups at eGroups.com
Received on Thu Nov 11 1999 - 08:29:43 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Tue Oct 22 2019 - 10:58:46 UTC