I agree, I have only Deathwing Terminators in my army not veterans. The
opponent fielded SM Veterans. It was a Horus Heresy battle.
Tom.
>From: <eivind.borgeteien_at_...>
>Reply-To: netepic_at_yahoogroups.com
>To: netepic_at_yahoogroups.com
>Subject: Sv: RE: [NetEpic ML] Dreadnaughts, Ravenwing, Scythes of the
>Emperor
>Date: Wed, 25 Jul 2001 9:40:43 +0200
>
>I think the Dartk Angels are the victims of some bad wording. As I
>understand it, the rules say that DA have no regular veterans, all are
>Deatwing, not that you cant field units from other SM chapters.
>
>Nils and I have argued on this before, but Id like to know what you others
>think...
>
>
>Eivind
> > Fra: nils.saugen_at_...
> > Dato: 2001/07/25 Wed AM 09:04:43 CEST
> > Til: netepic_at_yahoogroups.com
> > Emne: RE: [NetEpic ML] Dreadnaughts, Ravenwing, Scythes of the Emperor
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > Dreadnoughts with an increased move 5cm is an interesting thought we've,
>as
> > Eivind said, tried this for quite some time. However, I think you'll
>seldom
> > field the dreadnoughts anyway. I have a hard time finding any real use
>for
> > them.
> >
> > You got to remember that the Scytes of the Emperor is an Imperial Fists
> > unit! You shouldn't be able to field that if you ar playing with a Dark
> > Angles Army.
> >
> > Nils
> >
> >
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Tom Webb [mailto:Webbsoft_at_...]
> > Sent: 24. juli 2001 17:07
> > To: netepic_at_yahoogroups.com
> > Subject: [NetEpic ML] Dreadnaughts, Ravenwing, Scythes of the Emperor
> >
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > Just finished playing a game for the EZine, during the battle I
>took
> > a detachment of Punisher Dreadnaughts to test them out having heard the
> > various complaints on the mailing list.
> >
> > The game only lasted 2 turns as unfortunatly we racked up the
>VP's
> > pretty quick, the Dreads were too slow to make any difference within
>that
> > time, however they would have probably been of more use in Turn 3. They
> > never got into range despite an attack on their flank, they might have
>been
> > in range had our devestator detachment not been so effective (in one
>fire
> > phase they wiped out a Land Raider detachment on their own).
> >
> > I think the Dreadnaughts move should be increased to 15cms, the
> > extra 5cms would have enabled us to have brought them into the conflict
>as
> > it was they were ineffective.
> >
> > The Ravenwing was deadly, I will definatly take it again in
>future
> > battles. I thought it odd though that its command unit was an infantry
>HQ
> > unit with a Rhino. Why not have an optional special card which can only
>be
> > used with the Ravenwing called the 'Master of the Ravenwing' basically a
>HQ
> > unit mounted on a bike or a land speeder. Give it a high CAF, morale
>bonus
> > within 10cms, replaces the normal HQ unit and cost an extra 50 points.
> >
> > My opponent was interested in fielding a unit known as the
>Scythes
> > of the Emperor, it is a special card with a thunderhawk and 5 terminator
> > stands. It costs 250 points, will there be a version in NetEpic.
>Personally
> > I think it's price should be raised, but I wouldn't object against
>playing
> > him with it.
> >
> > One rules question for you, when a detachment is loaded into a
> > Thunderhawk, what happens to the rhinos? Are they loaded to or are they
>left
> > behind and become exempt from squad co-herency? Just asking because our
> > opponent used a Thunderhawk with a detachment of Veterans onboard the
>Rhinos
> > were left behind and I felt it was odd.
> >
> > Tom.
> >
> > To unsubscribe send e-mail to: netepic-unsubscribe_at_egroups.com
> >
> > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of
> > <http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/> Service.
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>
>To unsubscribe send e-mail to: netepic-unsubscribe_at_egroups.com
>
>Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>
_________________________________________________________________
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at
http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp
[ Attachment content not displayed ]
Received on Wed Jul 25 2001 - 08:03:15 UTC