It was a pretty lethal battle :-), city combat using the bloodbath scenario
(3 Objectives only, Double VPs for destroying enemy units).
I am working on the write up now, it is the pictures that are the headache.
The table was quite small for 4000k battle so fitting the units onto the
battlefield map is proving a nightmare. Any tips people?
Tom.
>From: nils.saugen_at_...
>Reply-To: netepic_at_yahoogroups.com
>To: netepic_at_yahoogroups.com
>Subject: RE: Sv: RE: [NetEpic ML] Dreadnaughts, Ravenwing, Scythes of the
>Emperor
>Date: Wed, 25 Jul 2001 10:05:05 +0200
>
>Looking forward to reading this report!!!!
>
>Nils
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Tom Webb [mailto:Webbsoft_at_...]
>Sent: 25. juli 2001 10:03
>To: netepic_at_yahoogroups.com
>Subject: Re: Sv: RE: [NetEpic ML] Dreadnaughts, Ravenwing, Scythes of
>the Emperor
>
>
>I agree, I have only Deathwing Terminators in my army not veterans. The
>opponent fielded SM Veterans. It was a Horus Heresy battle.
>
>Tom.
>
>
> >From: <eivind.borgeteien_at_...>
> >Reply-To: netepic_at_yahoogroups.com
> >To: netepic_at_yahoogroups.com
> >Subject: Sv: RE: [NetEpic ML] Dreadnaughts, Ravenwing, Scythes of the
> >Emperor
> >Date: Wed, 25 Jul 2001 9:40:43 +0200
> >
> >I think the Dartk Angels are the victims of some bad wording. As I
> >understand it, the rules say that DA have no regular veterans, all are
> >Deatwing, not that you cant field units from other SM chapters.
> >
> >Nils and I have argued on this before, but Id like to know what you
>others
> >think...
> >
> >
> >Eivind
> > > Fra: nils.saugen_at_...
> > > Dato: 2001/07/25 Wed AM 09:04:43 CEST
> > > Til: netepic_at_yahoogroups.com
> > > Emne: RE: [NetEpic ML] Dreadnaughts, Ravenwing, Scythes of the Emperor
> > >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > Dreadnoughts with an increased move 5cm is an interesting thought
>we've,
>
> >as
> > > Eivind said, tried this for quite some time. However, I think you'll
> >seldom
> > > field the dreadnoughts anyway. I have a hard time finding any real use
> >for
> > > them.
> > >
> > > You got to remember that the Scytes of the Emperor is an Imperial
>Fists
> > > unit! You shouldn't be able to field that if you ar playing with a
>Dark
> > > Angles Army.
> > >
> > > Nils
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Tom Webb [mailto:Webbsoft_at_...]
> > > Sent: 24. juli 2001 17:07
> > > To: netepic_at_yahoogroups.com
> > > Subject: [NetEpic ML] Dreadnaughts, Ravenwing, Scythes of the Emperor
> > >
> > >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > Just finished playing a game for the EZine, during the battle
>I
> >took
> > > a detachment of Punisher Dreadnaughts to test them out having heard
>the
> > > various complaints on the mailing list.
> > >
> > > The game only lasted 2 turns as unfortunatly we racked up the
> >VP's
> > > pretty quick, the Dreads were too slow to make any difference within
> >that
> > > time, however they would have probably been of more use in Turn 3.
>They
> > > never got into range despite an attack on their flank, they might have
> >been
> > > in range had our devestator detachment not been so effective (in one
> >fire
> > > phase they wiped out a Land Raider detachment on their own).
> > >
> > > I think the Dreadnaughts move should be increased to 15cms,
>the
> > > extra 5cms would have enabled us to have brought them into the
>conflict
> >as
> > > it was they were ineffective.
> > >
> > > The Ravenwing was deadly, I will definatly take it again in
> >future
> > > battles. I thought it odd though that its command unit was an infantry
> >HQ
> > > unit with a Rhino. Why not have an optional special card which can
>only
> >be
> > > used with the Ravenwing called the 'Master of the Ravenwing' basically
>a
>
> >HQ
> > > unit mounted on a bike or a land speeder. Give it a high CAF, morale
> >bonus
> > > within 10cms, replaces the normal HQ unit and cost an extra 50 points.
> > >
> > > My opponent was interested in fielding a unit known as the
> >Scythes
> > > of the Emperor, it is a special card with a thunderhawk and 5
>terminator
> > > stands. It costs 250 points, will there be a version in NetEpic.
> >Personally
> > > I think it's price should be raised, but I wouldn't object against
> >playing
> > > him with it.
> > >
> > > One rules question for you, when a detachment is loaded into a
> > > Thunderhawk, what happens to the rhinos? Are they loaded to or are
>they
> >left
> > > behind and become exempt from squad co-herency? Just asking because
>our
> > > opponent used a Thunderhawk with a detachment of Veterans onboard the
> >Rhinos
> > > were left behind and I felt it was odd.
> > >
> > > Tom.
> > >
> > > To unsubscribe send e-mail to: netepic-unsubscribe_at_egroups.com
> > >
> > > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of
> > > <http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/> Service.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> >To unsubscribe send e-mail to: netepic-unsubscribe_at_egroups.com
> >
> >Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
> >
>
>
>_________________________________________________________________
>Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp
>
>
>To unsubscribe send e-mail to: netepic-unsubscribe_at_egroups.com
>
>Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>
>
>
>To unsubscribe send e-mail to: netepic-unsubscribe_at_egroups.com
>
>Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>
>
_________________________________________________________________
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at
http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp
Received on Wed Jul 25 2001 - 08:21:46 UTC